Thanks to poster Charlotte on the F.E.A.S.T. site for highlighting this Stanford University Researcher's thoughts about the gastrointestinal system, the presence of serotonin and dopamine (for example) in the gut, and the possible linkages to hormone changes, among other facts. Jam-packed video. Harriet Brown examined some of this information in a 2005 NY Times article and I postulated about what serotonin in the gut might do in an earlier post but this is all a leap beyond what I learned a year ago from Martha Fankhauser.
Thanks to the wonderful world wide web, I also found this amazing website that focuses on autoimmunity lists studies having to do with serotonin. Striving Chef's posts house a wealth of information. What a great resource!
This research is very promising, for sure!
Information is provided about eating disorders, particularly of adults, to parents and other loved ones written by a parent who is in recovery from an eating disorder.
Welcome
When I created this blog, I was "getting on" in my early sixties, hence the blog name. However, my adult daughter's eating disorder and co-occurring emotional dysregulation disorder and other co-morbidities - ongoing for about 33 years - became and was our focus as we attempted to help her get into recovery. By learning about, reflecting on, reading about, attending conferences and writing about eating and brain disorders, I created a place to blog what I've learned. I hope this blog will be of use to others, especially families of and adult sufferers themselves to help them get into recovery. I update posts from time and the update date will be present at the top of the post.
Sadly, my daughter passed away in early October 2021 mainly because her body became so malnourished that she was immunocompromised, contracted a severe infection that was not properly addressed during an earlier hospital stay the month before, and developed an overwhelming non-covid pneumonia following surgery to save her life. I believe she should have been able to receive palliative care but Arizona, our country, and even the professionals trained in the treatment of eating disorders, particularly anorexia, are not "there" yet. I address the issue of palliative care in a recent post below, initially written in November 2021. I am not a certified eating disorder specialist. I am an Expert by Experience and college-educated with a BA in Community Work with an additional certificate in a one-year program in Business Administration from the same institution.
I am passionate about all of this because, as Shakespeare wrote in The Taming of the Shrew, Act 4, Scene 3: "My tongue will tell the anger [and sadness] of my heart or else my heart, concealing it, will break. And, rather than it shall, I will be free even to the uttermost, as I please in words."[2016]
Travel Guide
If you're new to my blog, I recommend you begin on the right side and take a look at the "Of Note" offerings. Read Dr. Cynthia Bulik's recent published interview (5/4/22) "Rethinking Eating Disorders" if you want to print an easy-to-understand professional's expert opinion about anorexia for your family doctor or the therapist. [Early intervention is absolutely critical. For those whose eating disorder is categorized as entrenched or severe and enduring, read the editorial comment by Stephen Touyz and Philipa Hay for a new approach about treatment. It is possible for your loved one to recover! I have also attached a link here for additional papers on the subject of severe and entrenched eating disorders. If you are a family member or friend of an adult with an eating disorder and have been at this for awhile, I refer you to the posts within the title "Adult Eating Disorders and Recovery Tools" found in the Index on the right hand side of this site. As well, in the "Of Note" section take a look at those posts with an asterisk. If you're a parent and need support, look for posts in the Index about parent support or parent toolbox.
In my opinion, the best book to buy, to refer to constantly and to share with members of the medical/psychiatric profession is "Sick Enough: A Guide to the Medical Complications of Eating Disorders" by Jennifer L. Gaudiani MD, CEDS, FAED. "Dr. Gaudiani aims to improve medical diagnosis and treatment, motivate recovery, and validate the lived experiences of individuals of all body shapes and sizes, while firmly rejecting dieting culture."
I recommend two groups who will support you on your journey - F.E.A.S.T and the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Both maintain websites and Facebook private groups.
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Monday, December 26, 2011
Too much dopamine? not enough oxytocin? SSRI's? Autism Spectrum?
In earlier posts, after a detailed discussion with Martha Fankhauser, a pharmacologist whose interest extends to working with local behavioral health providers, I wrote about the balance of SSRI's and dopamine, and mentioned the problems that occur when dopamine is in excess. A simple explanation along with symptoms can be found at this site, too. I also thought out loud about the significance of oxytocin.
These neurotransmitters and this hormone are on my mind again today because I just read a fascinating article in today's New York Times (December 26, 2011) titled "Navigating Love and Autism" in which the young man mentioned, who has been diagnosed with a form of autism (others describe the symptoms as being along the autism spectrum) known as Asperger syndrome, is also thinking about these things.
The article is an insightful piece, looking at the problems that people -- children, young adults, and adults -- must deal with. The article is also illuminating for those who do not understand the syndrome or haven't needed to not only because it reviews articulately the behaviors that many find rude or hard to understand but also opens doors of possibility for those reading it to recognize behaviors of a family member or client (as in the case of a psychologist or psychiatrist).
I am among many who believe that many of the behaviors we see connected with the autism syndrome, eating disorders, "personality disorders" such as borderline personality disorder (which research is showing is also a disorder of the brain rather than of the personality) and other brain disorders such as schizophrenia are all linked in the sense that they rise from imbalances in neurochemicals or in the endocrine system. Until the cause is found that might be treated, the current approach is to treat with meds. Finding the right one, or multiples, and the balancing of those is critical. So is teaching those with these disorders to learn how to cope and therefore develop new and improved ways of interacting with and responding to their environment.
A significant interest of the young man written about -- Jack Robison -- is on the biochemical/neurological issues that are in the background of his syndrome and he has been investigating those. I hope he and others continue the investigation.
These neurotransmitters and this hormone are on my mind again today because I just read a fascinating article in today's New York Times (December 26, 2011) titled "Navigating Love and Autism" in which the young man mentioned, who has been diagnosed with a form of autism (others describe the symptoms as being along the autism spectrum) known as Asperger syndrome, is also thinking about these things.
The article is an insightful piece, looking at the problems that people -- children, young adults, and adults -- must deal with. The article is also illuminating for those who do not understand the syndrome or haven't needed to not only because it reviews articulately the behaviors that many find rude or hard to understand but also opens doors of possibility for those reading it to recognize behaviors of a family member or client (as in the case of a psychologist or psychiatrist).
I am among many who believe that many of the behaviors we see connected with the autism syndrome, eating disorders, "personality disorders" such as borderline personality disorder (which research is showing is also a disorder of the brain rather than of the personality) and other brain disorders such as schizophrenia are all linked in the sense that they rise from imbalances in neurochemicals or in the endocrine system. Until the cause is found that might be treated, the current approach is to treat with meds. Finding the right one, or multiples, and the balancing of those is critical. So is teaching those with these disorders to learn how to cope and therefore develop new and improved ways of interacting with and responding to their environment.
A significant interest of the young man written about -- Jack Robison -- is on the biochemical/neurological issues that are in the background of his syndrome and he has been investigating those. I hope he and others continue the investigation.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Involving Your Local Schools - a CD-ROM of kits from NEDA
While visiting the Parents, Family and Friends Network of NEDA this morning, I was delighted to learn that NEDA will send a CD-ROM packet containing three updated as of November 1, 2011, information kits directed to (1) educators, (2) coaches, and athletic trainers, and (3) parents to schools in your area on your behalf. Click here for more information about the kits and scroll down to the link provided.
Parents, you can click on the same link, click on the kit for parents, and download a valuable printed reference notebook. I've put mine in a 3-ring binder.
Parents, you can click on the same link, click on the kit for parents, and download a valuable printed reference notebook. I've put mine in a 3-ring binder.
Guest Post by Dr. Julie O'Toole - Inpatient Eating Disorder Treatment Checklist for Parents
If your child or adolescent is admitted to a hospital for the medical complications of an eating disorder, you need to carefully assess adequacy of care at that hospital.
Common sense would dictate that we not become aggressive, belittling or demanding of professionals on whom our child is temporarily dependent for medical intervention, however you should not hesitate to inform yourself, rely on your intuition and experience and ask questions. The days of “because I said so and I am the doctor” are gone in medicine, or should be.There are basically two types of medical hospitalizations for eating disorder crises: 1. the emergent kind at the nearest hospital, regardless of that hospital’s specific eating disorder expertise and 2. the urgent kind in a hospital which you have sought out specifically because of their expertise in treating the complications of eating disorders.
In the first kind of hospitalization, you may need to be patient until imminent danger of death has passed and then arrange transfer elsewhere. An example of this might be an admission to an internist, pediatrician or hospitalist at a community hospital for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, severe inanition (wasting) or syncope (fainting). We had an adolescent patient referred to us once whom the police had found semi-conscious at the side of the road, grossly starved and cold. This extreme is what I mean by an emergent admission for inanition. If such an admission is needed and the hospital team does not have an AED handbook for medical care, provide them with one.
The second kind of admission (urgent, experienced or specialist hospital) is more usually done for a patient who may or may not be expected to die without such care, but who is in any case compromised medically and/or may reasonably be feared to be in danger of re-feeding syndrome if re-fed in another setting. Such patients might be expected to meet AAP admission guidelines for orthostasis, bradycardia, etc.
The following is a check list I am proposing for parents to use in evaluating the adequacy of their child’s hospital care:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent? Are you blamed for your child’s illness? Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited? If the answer to any of these questions is “yes”, move this hospital to the “unacceptable” pile and seek care elsewhere as soon as you can.
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care? This needs to be an attending physician or nurse practitioner. If it is a team of doctors who rotate, ask who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs.
- How often is phosphorus checked? This will need to be daily (or more often in the Intensive Care Unit, aka ICU) as long as calories are still being adjusted upward.
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight? Most hospitalizations are not long enough to achieve full weight restoration and ultimate goal weights usually only matter this early in the hospitalization in those cases where a need for weight restoration is ignored, for example where the doctor/team argues that the “patient’s BMI was too high to begin with” (!!). For most patients the issue addressed under Point 5 below is much more critical. I strongly recommend that weight goals not be shared with the pediatric patient either by the staff or by the parent.
- Although it is common for a patient to actually lose weight for the first 2-4 days of re-feeding due to fluid shifts, after that the weight curve should be steadily upward. Ask: who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily? Excellent weight gain should average 0.2 kg/day. If it is lower than that see Point 6 below.
- Calculating calories/food intake: the majority of patients hospitalized for an eating disorder will have lost weight relative to their own norm. This means they will enter the re-feeding process hypometabolic as the brain tries to conserve energy in a time of famine. Once you begin re-feeding, however, the metabolic fires will jump up and the patient will need many more calories than ever before. It is critical that calories/food are titrated to weight gain, so that if the rate of gain is much less than 0.2 kg/day more food will be added. Fat must never be allowed to be restricted. On this specific point your questions for your treatment team are: What is the start point for caloric intake (low is fine)? How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often? And—importantly—is phosphorus checked during this time? I strongly recommend that discussions of calories/exchanges/fat grams not be shared with the pediatric patient by the staff or by a parent.
- How are meals supervised? I can’t tell you how often kids report back to me that they were able to hide food or spit out medications because of a lack of adequate staff supervision.
- Aftercare should be discussed from the outset, after about 24 hrs of hospital care. Everyone is usually too upset for the first 24 hours to take in much information about aftercare planning, but in order to maintain the gains made in the hospital and prevent re-hospitalization, it will be important to hand-off the pediatric patient to an outpatient team whether that team is a “Maudsley” style team, a day treatment team or other. How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers (including the family of course!)?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging? Experienced teams will always have a plan for this. It matters.
- Are patients with very low heart rates or personal histories of fainting monitored on telemetry? We have had a handful of patients who experienced “asystole” or stopping of the heart, which caused them to “faint”. Had they not been on telemetry we might have just ascribed this to “dehydration”. On the cardiac monitor we were clearly able to see how, in some vulnerable patients, the heart can be acted on by a simple stimulus such as a blood draw, standing up from lying down, etc. with an episode of cardiac arrest.
So to recap the questions:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent?
- Are you blamed for your child’s illness?
- Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited?
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care?
- Who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs?
- How often is phosphorus checked?
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight?
- Who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily?
- What is the start point for caloric intake?
- How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often?
- Are calories increased to meet any loss of weight or stagnation in weight gain?
- Is phosphorus checked during this time (of caloric increase)?
- How are meals supervised?
- How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging?
- Do they keep their patients with bradycardia (low heart rate) on telemetry?
[Re-printed here with the permission of Dr. O'Toole who is the founder and medical director of the Kartini Clinic for Disordered Eating.]
The Parent, Family and Friends Network - Insurance Information article by Susan Maccia
The Parent, Family and Friends Network of the National Eating Disorders Association publishes a quarterly newsletter. One of the issues (fall 2011) includes several important articles (as usual) including a piece by outgoing PFN chair, Susan Maccia, on Single Case Agreements. The article identifies an SCA as:
If the services to meet an identified clinical need are not available within the contracted network, necessary services are provided in a timely manner through an out-of-network provider. A Single Case Agreement is a contractual agreement developed for an enrolled person (insured) based on that person's behavioral health needs and for a predetermined period of time.
Among the articles in this issue: a NEDA Conference recap (2011), Males and Eating Disorders, the NEDA Navigators, the existence of a NEDA Loss Support Network, an announcement of planned free webinars, and one about athletes and eating disorders.
To find out more about the PFN Network, click here
Friday, December 2, 2011
"Out of the Darkness"
"Out of the Darkness" is the title of an essay written by Mark Lukach that appeared in the New York Times on Sunday, November 27, 2011, in the Sunday Styles Modern Love Section, p. 6. The title caught my eye because it reminded me of the incredibly illuminating essay that was originally published in Vanity Fair and then became a book by William Styron - Darkness Visible - A Memoir of Madness (Random House, 1990) that I purchased almost twenty years ago when I wanted to understand more about depression and perhaps empathize more effectively with a loved one suffering from a severe depression at that time. The essay written by Mr. Lukach is accompanied by a sketch showing two people in a sad embrace with the image of a woman falling in the head of one of the two people.
I could stop here and encourage you to read it but I want to say a bit more about the article.
A husband walks through and supports fully his wife's journey through a terrible psychotic break and the story is rich with language that so well describes her and his experience.
Essays like these, I believe, are so helpful to the public unfamiliar with brain disorders. So many (and at one time I counted myself among them) do not understand mental illness. So many read and hear comments that stigmatize mental illness. The media publishes and displays the comments and views that stigmatize mental illness/brain disorders to the detriment of many who are seriously ill and need help but who are afraid to ask for it for fear of being labeled unemployable or worse yet, called "crazy" - a terribly derogatory word.
Will.....Willpower
[It's raining with some lightning here so rather than going for a hike this morning, I pulled out this article because the subject has intrigued me for a very long time. I have wondered what was behind my decision to quit my eating disorder - sick and tired of being sick and tired? change in mind-set? deeper understanding of my "self"? will power? And, if willpower, am I genetically blessed with the whatever it is to have a strong will?....]
The Sunday, November 27, 2011, New York Times published an article titled "Willpower: It's in Your Head" written by Greg Walton, an assistant professor of psychology at Stanford and Carol Dweck, professor of psychology, also at Stanford [colleagues of Dr. James Lock?] in which they conclude that attributing our failures of will to our biology -- to our "fixed biological limits" -- is wrong.
They state,
"In research that we conducted with the psychologist Veronika Job, we confirmed that willpower can indeed be quite limited -- but only if you believe it is. When people believe that willpower is fixed and limited, their willpower is easily depleted. But when people believe that willpower is self-renewing -- that when you work hard, you're energized to work more; that when you've resisted one temptation, you can better resist the next one -- then people successfully exert more willpower. It turns out that willpower is in your head."
[The mind/brain is an amazing thing, isn't it?]
The authors provide studies and the results to support this thesis. They emphasize that of course a person needs to eat and to rest/sleep but they do not, as posited by Roy F. Baumeister and John Tierney in their book Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, need to ingest straight glucose to keep that willpower going.
The authors of the New York Times article conclude by writing,
"At stake in this debate is not just a question about the nature of willpower. It's also a question of what kind of people we want to be. Do we want to be a people who dismiss our weaknesses as unchangeable? When a student struggles in math, should we tell that student, "Don't worry, you're just not a math person"? Do we want him [or her] to give up in the name of biology? Or do we want him to work harder in the spirit of what he wants to become."
Yes, this essay does not mention those who have disabilities and I do believe, no matter what they write, that some people have difficult with advanced mathematics (I do; my daughter doesn't at all). Neither does it touch on genetics. However, this essay and the book have me curious enough that I'll probably read the recently published book -- for I know that the brain does need 500 calories a day of glucose preferably (my opinion) available from complex carbohydrates and not straight sugar as the authors apparently suggested on NPR -- and I'm happy to see that researchers are continuing to take a look at this aspect of our behavior/decision making.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Has the Tipping Point Been Reached? - Drs. Bulik and Ravin
This week two different internet news items caught my attention.
The first was a 56-minute presentation by Dr. Cynthia Bulik of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at a Stockholm Psychiatry Lecture held at Karolinska Institutet, November 15, 2011. The title of her talk is The Complex Dance of Genes and Environment in Eating Disorders and can be found here, thanks to You Tube! Some of the slides she presents are graphic and can be triggering or very upsetting to those with either anorexia or bulimia. They were important, I believe, for the thrust of her talk. Dr. Bulik's lecture is hugely important not only for the scientific information she presents but also because she has taken a step further and looked at the potential for possibly preventing the occurrence of eating disorders in the offspring of those with either eating disorders or the family propensity for those illnesses. Those of us who attended the F.E.A.S.T. conference in early November in Alexandria, Virginia heard some of her points; this lecture is far more extensive.
I was also excited to hear her state there is a genetic consortium of scientists to further the study of anorexia nervosa known as GCAN. The website that is part of the Department of Psychiatry Eating Disorders Program at UNC Chapel Hill states,
Since 2007, the University of North Carolina Eating Disorders Program has led a world effort to unite clinicians and researchers around the world in an effort to identify genes that may influence risk for eating disorders. This has resulted in the Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa (GCAN) which currently consists of researchers and clinicians from 16 countries around the world. Together with researcher from Kings College London, the UNC program has been honored to receive a grant from the Wellcome Trust (WTCCC3) to conduct genomewide association on over 4000 DNA samples from individuals with anorexia nervosa. All members of the consortium are gathering information about eating disorders course and genetic material (DNA) from any individual who currently has or has had an eating disorder in the past. This world-wide effort is inviting every person with current or past anorexia nervosa to take the time to roll up their sleeves and help us figure out the cause of eating disorders.
We are currently gathering information and genetic material (DNA from a blood sample) from women who have had anorexia nervosa at any time in their life. Information from this study will advance our understanding of the causes of anorexia nervosa and further our ability to develop more effective treatments and prevention strategies.
If you are female and have had anorexia nervosa at any time in your life, you are invited to participate in this study. Participation only takes 30 minutes and includes a blood draw.
If you are female and have had anorexia nervosa at any time in your life, you are invited to participate in this study. Participation only takes 30 minutes and includes a blood draw.
Call Jessica Baker today at 919-966-1217 or her at jessica_baker@med.unc.edu if you are interested in donating your blood to help us unlock the genetic code of eating disorders.
Note that they are looking for participants for this study.
The word consortium is what especially caught my attention because this concept - consortium - is spreading throughout the scientific world to bring research results forward faster, to obtain grants and donations to expedite that research, and to collect meaningful data that is understandable across fields.
So is consensus science.
So is consensus science.
The second item was Dr. Sarah Ravin's recent post titled, "Active Ingredients" Dr. Ravin's post is extraordinary because she not only takes a firm, public stand on the approach to be taken when treating those with eating disorders, she also provides a flow chart for how one must treat a person with an eating disorder. This post is important for scientific researchers, psychiatrists, medical doctors, therapists, nutritionists and families. I would call it a "recommendation for best practices in the treatment of an eating disorder."
Her introduction is so very important -
To the patient’s detriment, many clinicians do not add the right ingredients at the right times in the right doses. For example, many individual therapy approaches focus initially on helping the patient develop insight and motivation to recover. Full nutrition is not required, or even encouraged, until the patient has lost a significant amount of weight.
Many clinicians are simply using the wrong recipe.
Dr. Ravin goes on to list the essentials at each step as well as the issues that can wait. The flow chart isn't for a month or even three months (the typical length of time paid for by insurance companies in this country, the latter figure of three months rather unusual). Her chart covers a period of 12-18 months (!) and in closing incorporates a list of must haves before a parent sends a young person off to college or to live independently.
Dr. Ravin highlights the importance of investigating the possibility of other factors such as brain disorders like anxiety, OCD, and depression and their treatment, something I've been pushing for for a long time in comments on Something Fishy and other websites because of my loved one's experience. Too often families and therapists think a person will be "well" once they are re-nourished and in some cases that is true or seems to be true. The symptoms seem to disappear. Yet, the propensity is still there. In many cases this myth of "only an eating disorder" must be dispelled on behalf of those who fall back into the abyss and cannot seem to climb out because these and other illnesses have not been diagnosed, have not been treated, and the individuals have not been provided with the tools (also mentioned in Dr. Ravin's chart) to quell their anxiety or to "regulate emotions and tolerate distress." This is where CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and DBT (Dialectical Behavioral Therapy) and other modalities are introduced.
I was so thrilled to see and read Dr. Ravin's post as well as watch Dr. Bulik. I know we've reached the tipping point. Now with films like Someday Melissa and Miss Representation getting nationwide attention (the latter has already been screened here in Tucson by The Arizona List) and organizations like F.E.A.S.T., NEDA and its affiliates, and NAMI along with the attention of the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Mental Health (thank you Dr. Insel!) we need to keep raising our voices and spreading the word.
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Guest Post by Marjie Ruth: Who's Driving Your Bus?
Once we accept that everything is exactly as it should be,
and nothing needs fixing,we can relax and just breathe.
We can leave the fixing to a higher power.
~ author unknown
I chose the opening quote for this week's email for a number of reasons. First, I was drawn to it because of the promise of comfort. It tells us "we can relax", and it even encourages us to relax not just a little, but a whole lot. "Just breathe", the author suggests to us. Ahhhh, and wouldn't it feel oh so good to be able to let go of all of today's worries...all of our concerns for tomorrow...to let go of "to do" lists, to vanquish overflowing inboxes on our email accounts, to set aside thoughts of holiday gifts to be bought & wrapped & perhaps mailed. While we're at it let's relinquish all the tension over projects that want finishing, relationships that need tending, houses & gardens that need cleaning, bills that should be paid, and the list could go on and on. Throw on top of all the hassles that go with day to day living in this modern age of convenience, speed, & ease, the perhaps on-again-off-again struggles with our loved ones as they deal with life through the distorted prism that is an eating disorder, and we may be seeing ourselves as so weighed down that we are actually struggling to breathe at all. The idea of relaxing may seem a bit comical or even mildly absurd.
Yes, what first seemed a wonderful invitation, may taunt us with perceived sarcasm. "Sure, I'll take time off to relax, and then things will only pile up more while I do! Better to keep going, to work a little harder, a little faster, a little longer, and surely I'll make some progress and get it right!" If we let our goal-oriented, perfectionist self continue in charge with a determination to conquer and control, not only will we eschew any thoughts of relaxation, but surely we'll dig ourselves a hole as we spin our wheels trying to fix our lives so that all will be right. One can only hope that the hole we dig is not 6 feet deep!
Now that I've managed to virtually destroy the idea of relaxing, let's start at the beginning of the quote and see if that's any help. I guess I avoided starting here because at first glance I find it to be a troublesome statement. "Once we accept..." Just starting there alerts me to the fact that I'm probably going to have to let go of something. Anytime anyone tells you,"Now, you're just going to need to accept the fact that..." Ouch, I know this is going to hurt. Whatever it is that comes after the "that", it will be something that I'm not going to like. Accept that you're not going to win the lottery, get the job, or whatever else it is that you were wanting. Accept that you're living beyond your means. Accept that it's beyond your control. Accept that you can't make it happen. Accept that your loved one has a serious disorder and life may never be what you expected.
Our Unknown Author is asking us to accept that everything is exactly as it should be. Well that's fine and a beautiful sentiment if you just happen to have all of your ducks in a row right now. But what about for the rest of us who might not be exactly thrilled with the state of our lives at the moment? Are we also supposed to accept that everything is exactly as it should be? "But wait" you might be pleading, "because it just doesn't seem to be as good as it should be, as I wanted things to be. It just doesn't seem fair." When the author goes on to tell us that "nothing needs fixing", that may be enough to make you want to tell Mr Unknown Author that he doesn't know anything. Hey, I'm a take charge kind of person. Nothing I love more than a fixer upper--a project that I can whip into shape and by doing so make a visible improvement in the state of things. Whether it's putting a messy room to order, resolving a challenging task at work, or helping to get a life back on track, I'm good to go. Making a difference and making things better is the ultimate high for me. Reading this quote was almost a bit unsettling as opposed to being a comfort as I think both the author and the person who sent it to me probably thought it should be.
So this two sentence quote has required multiple readings and some time for thought in order for me to appreciate what it has to offer. The second sentence is the rest of the gift. "We can leave the fixing to a higher power." And that is the conclusion that a natural born perfectionist controller like myself must work to comprehend. We're back to steps one & two of the 12 steps: admitting our powerlessness and relinquishing the desire to control to our Higher Power. We each have many talents and skills, but controlling the behavior of others is not one of them. And when dealing with an addict, any struggle for control will only play into the hands of the addiction. This is a tough, tough notion to grasp, and I struggle with it every day. To admit my powerlessness over my loved one's disorder initially feels so defeating, so reckless as to be dangerous, because surely we're putting them in danger when we step out of our attempts to control and maintain order. But that is only the way it feels...that emotional, irrational reaction to our own fear of letting go. In truth, our attempts to control have only been illusions at best, more often enabling, and co-dependent enmeshment at worst.
In order to accept our own powerlessness over our loved one's addiction, we must first grieve the fact that we can't fix things. The best part of parenting is being the absolute center of someone's universe and being able to swoop in time and time again to fix, to mend, to set right, to comfort. And what may feel like the worst part of parenting is the recognition that we are no longer that center, that fixer, that mender. While we may mourn that loss, it is vital that we come to terms with our proper place in our loved one's world, and this goes for spouses and partners as well. Learning this new role will take time and effort, but it is not without rewards. Loosing our grip on our power trip will free us to embrace a different role and that will make a difference in the relationship. Healthy boundaries make for healthier relationships in the long run. Does it mean that everything will turn out right?? That depends on what your definition of what "right" is. If for you it means being in total control so that you can make everyone happy, then you have no hope of achieving that end anyway. Like Sisyphus doomed to eternally push a huge boulder up a hill only to see it roll back down again & again, fixing others in order to achieve happiness is an impossible goal. If, on the other hand, you have come to see that you can't "make" the world right, you can learn to understand and accept that you or I cannot fix or control the minds and behaviors of others. We can focus on our own personal growth as the means to enhancing our world and the impact we have on those around us.
Greyhound Bus Lines used to have a commercial that said, "Relax, and leave the driving to us!" Hmmm, I think that's just what I need to do. While I won't be hopping on a bus anytime soon, I think I will to envision myself on a bus. But unlike I might have seen in the past, instead of being in the driver's seat I will slip into a passenger seat. I'm not going to try to control the drive, but instead I'll concentrate on enjoying the ride. Why not? Truth is that I was only kidding myself when I sought to put myself in the driver's place. Just as I totally lack the ability to shift and steer a huge bus, I delude myself when I think I can be the "driver" for the bus ride that is life, and especially when encountering such treacherous conditions as an addiction. In order to enjoy my ride, I must trust the driver. With my Higher Power taking over, I can relax and even feel relieved that I don't have to be driving. Because I'm no longer seeing myself as responsible for managing all of the lives around me, I can breathe a little easier and begin to relax a bit more. It feels a little strange at first, I admit, but T think I'm going to give this ride a try.
So, no matter what's on your "To Do" list today, won't you consider parking your car and taking a bus ride with me? Please, give it some thought.
Peacefully,
Marjie Ruth
727-244-9011 (c)
Friday, November 25, 2011
Avoiding Fragmented Treatment for the Adult with an Eating Disorder
Isaacson created a superb volume that not only captured Steve Jobs' life, but also captured the last few decades during which technology took an enormous leap forward as well as the management/operational philosophy that kept Apple in the lead.
So where's the connection with eating disorders?
So where's the connection with eating disorders?
The philosophy he espoused at Apple has not yet been fully embraced by the health care field, an area that must adopt such a philosophy on behalf of its patients whether they have pancreatic cancer or an eating disorder.
Steve Jobs noted at the end of his life, that ".... he was facing the type of problem that he never permitted at Apple. His treatment was fragmented rather than integrated. Each of his myriad maladies was being treated by different specialists -- oncologists, pain specialists, nutritionists, hepatologists, and hematologists -- but they were not being coordinated in a cohesive approach.... [emphasis mine].
In addition, Isaacson writes, Jobs' wife, Laurene Powell stated, "One of the big issues in the health care industry is the lack of caseworkers or advocates that are the quarterback of each team."
In Jobs' case, this meant that "....nobody seemed to be in charge of figuring out how nutrition was related to pain care and to oncology." [Steve Jobs by Walter Isaacson, Simon and Schuster, 2011, excerpts from pages 549-550.]
As the mother of an adult who has been in and out of treatment centers and on the "outside" working with a variety of psychiatrists, psychologists, nutritionists, medical doctors, other health care workers, and therapists for more than 30 [2019] years, I have seen the exact same thing happen in her world as Jobs' described in his.
My loved one came close to getting the perfect kind of care she absolutely needed while in residential facilities, especially the two most recent times, when all of this and food as well as a bed was put together at the tune of what normally is charged -- anywhere between $1,000 and $2,500 a day. Since even looking at those figures can be frightening, it is especially so for those who lack health insurance or whose insurance company does not provide coverage for eating disorders which are biologically based disorders. The brain is a physical part of the body, is it not?
More recently my loved one, because of her diagnosis here in Arizona, received a two-tiered approach -- the behavioral health team took care of everything above her neck that was inside her skull (even the meds prescribed that clearly had an effect on her entire physiological being); and the medical piece (everything below the neck or not involved with the brain) was the responsibility of a medical doctor and secondarily of a nutritionist.
The caseworker's responsibility did not at first carry over to the medical piece. This oversight somewhat changed further along in a critical period, an enormous credit to her behavioral health care organization here in Tucson. However, there was and still is no provision of food/appropriate nutrition and its preparation and delivery by any kind of insurance covered treatment for eating disorders outside of the hospital or residential facility in this dynamic.
The caseworker's responsibility did not at first carry over to the medical piece. This oversight somewhat changed further along in a critical period, an enormous credit to her behavioral health care organization here in Tucson. However, there was and still is no provision of food/appropriate nutrition and its preparation and delivery by any kind of insurance covered treatment for eating disorders outside of the hospital or residential facility in this dynamic.
So the question is for her and for many, what does an adult do after leaving a residential facility to maintain his/her eating patterns? What might make this easier?
Food is medicine for those with eating disorders as I've noted and explained elsewhere on this blog. This concept is the backbone of the people of F.E.A.S.T. many of whom feed their younger loved ones at home. As I have written elsewhere, often adults will reject this approach of living at home under the watch of a parent. Without food, the body will die. Without biochemical balance, the body will eventually or suddenly die.
Several other things happen to the body when it is malnourished or mistreated, too, that also can lead to death.
Because insurance companies pay attention to the bottom line, they rarely grant more than 30-60 days of residential treatment for someone whose eating disorder has taken over their life. Believe me, an eating disorder is a deadly disease that can require months of therapy, re-nourishment and monitored eating (depending on the diagnosis that can range from anorexia to bulimia to ed-nos to binge eating disorder and probably several other varieties that do not yet have a name) and then possibly years of staying vigilant against the threat of its return depending on their incorporation of some form of cognitive therapy. An eating disorder indeed takes over their life. Their behavior patterns are altered; their brain chemistry changes. Eating disorders are the deadliest of all brain disorders/mental illnesses.
A caseworker working with the individual (e.g. an independent adult) or the family (adult living at home or a person under 18) would certainly help to keep everyone on board and communicating with each other about the care of the person with an eating disorder. Often this falls to the mother, or the family, or a concerned advocate who is at the same time often responsible for making a living full time on behalf of the family/individual. This is difficult at best and impossible for some to handle.
A neutral person, highly skilled in the field of eating disorders and paid for by insurance, might be a better answer. For example, a caseworker might be a psychiatric social worker with experience and training in the field of eating disorders.
A caseworker working with the individual (e.g. an independent adult) or the family (adult living at home or a person under 18) would certainly help to keep everyone on board and communicating with each other about the care of the person with an eating disorder. Often this falls to the mother, or the family, or a concerned advocate who is at the same time often responsible for making a living full time on behalf of the family/individual. This is difficult at best and impossible for some to handle.
A neutral person, highly skilled in the field of eating disorders and paid for by insurance, might be a better answer. For example, a caseworker might be a psychiatric social worker with experience and training in the field of eating disorders.
How can we as a society make certain that until scientists figure out the "why" and develop a "cure", if such a thing is possible (and I believe genetically it is), we must create a seamless method of treatment and care for each and every person who develops an eating disorder and ensure that a caseworker as well as food/proper nutrition and its preparation and delivery are part of that prescribed treatment, whether the person is in the hospital, a residential facility, and out-patient facility or at home.
For the most part, each person who has been diagnosed with an eating disorder, shows incredible promise to our world. They tend to be intelligent, driven, and perfectionistic often obsessed with details as well as able to see the entire picture when their brains are working correctly and they are well-nourished. Economically speaking, they represent the next generation of people who will invent; create; lead; write music, poetry, novels; create beautiful works of art; discover cures; raise talented children....... and take our country forward. It is estimated that at least 10 million people in our country have eating disorders and need help.
Surely our legislators and our government can work together to make sure that those with eating disorders receive care that is not fragmented as they work to get on and stay on the path to recovery.
Friday, November 18, 2011
Rules of the House When an Adult Returns (or for a teen who already lives there)
[The following post may be triggering for those with active eating disorders.]
The topic of rules of the house has come up now and then on a site I frequent for parents of those with eating disorders. We certainly needed to address this subject six years ago when my very ill loved one rejoined our household after living either independently or with a significant other for more than ten years. Our goal was to help her stay alive and get her into treatment when she was willing to take that step. Parents of adults returning to the household might want to consider this step, too.
Other parents need to bring up this subject when things go completely out of control in their household when ED (the Eating Disorder) moves in and takes over the mind of their teenager or younger child although this post is directed for parents of teens and adults.
In either case, many have experienced the aftermath of midnight binges, the discovery of money missing from the community food jar or even checks and credit cards from a purse/wallet, food wrappers in a personal closet or under the bed, a clogged toilet or shower drain, stashes of food not eaten or bags of regurgitated food somewhere in the room or in the garbage bin, etc., etc. Others have been shocked to discover their loved one has been out and about late at night, either on foot or in the car. For some, suddenly all the behaviors a parent thought were part of (relatively speaking, given teenage years) peaceful daily living in the house have been replaced by those of a seemingly rebellious person intent on creating mayhem.
Once I shared some samples from teenage rules kinds of sites on the above-mentioned eating disorder site, I read a range of reactions. Some parents simply shut the door and continued taking their child to therapy, figuring the behavior might improve. Another couple I know locked their bedroom door each night; another put a lock on the pantry; another, a lock on the refrigerator; one kept no food at all in the house for a period of time. Some took away car or other privileges.
We took the attitude of "our house, our rules." Given the age of our loved one, we're older, too, and not as amenable to disruption as younger parents might be. We did find ourselves retreating to our bedroom on occasion and shutting the door for our own time out. But for the most part, because we negotiated rules with our loved one who also consulted her own therapist before the final draft was acceptable to all, we reached agreement on a list that worked for our family in our situation. Every family is going to be different. I discuss this on a post re communication, too.
The suggestions of the communication method LEAP help a lot in this process.
I went searching for the original draft because it was fairly comprehensive and might serve as a working template for those considering inviting their adult back into their household. Of course, the list will pertain to their knowledge of their loved one's behavior. We've heard comments from others with an adult with an eating disorder like "our adult is behaving like a teenager again!" And, of course, these documents can always be renegotiated as things get better or possibly become worse.
We do recommend that the document be treated like a contract and that the parent(s) be prepared to firmly stand behind the boundaries listed. As many parents have discovered, it's not uncommon for one with an eating disorder to try to get around the rules. Secrecy is a major tool. So is the ED's manipulation.
As will become obvious very quickly, the parent(s) must follow these rules, too! The expression, do as I say and not as I do does not work in this situation.
Here is that draft drawn from several sources before we altered it to fit our situation living here in the desert with scorpions, cockroaches, and crickets:
1. All communication channels will remain open between and among all members of your team, including your parents -- with no restrictions.
[this one is key; without this provision things can get out of control really fast]
2. There will be no physical or verbal abuse in the home. Verbal abuse includes yelling. This includes obscene gestures, as well. No slamming of doors. [We know a parent who removed the door to his adult child's room; another who removed a teenager's door.]
3. Treat household members and property with respect.
4. Your room must be clean before you leave for the day/go to school, etc.
This means: bed made, clothes picked up off floor and either put in drawers, hung in closet, placed on appropriate shelves or in dirty clothes basket; other things put away in drawers or ordered neatly on dresser surface.
5. Kitchen: Dishes are not to be left in the sink. Wash and put in dish drain/ or place in dishwasher. Clean up any spills right away. Clean up eating area after each meal including floor
6. All food is to be eaten in either the kitchen or dining room area.
7. Kitchen/pantry is off limits after dinner and before breakfast. [For those parents new to bulimia or binge eating disorder, those with bulimia or BED often may binge in secrecy either in their room or in the kitchen after everyone has gone to bed. The purpose of this rule is to take a stand against binge eating to make it clear that this behavior is not allowed.]
8. No visits to the bathroom for at least 45 minutes after meals/snacks
[Often a loved one will retreat to the bathroom immediately after eating to purge what s/he has eaten. This rule is to prevent this from happening. After 45 minutes to an hour, a lot of the nutrients eaten have been absorbed so although vomiting will be very detrimental for electrolyte balance, calories will not be as severely affected; ditto, by the way, re laxatives]
[Often a loved one will retreat to the bathroom immediately after eating to purge what s/he has eaten. This rule is to prevent this from happening. After 45 minutes to an hour, a lot of the nutrients eaten have been absorbed so although vomiting will be very detrimental for electrolyte balance, calories will not be as severely affected; ditto, by the way, re laxatives]
9. Laundry room: place only washable clothes in washer/dryer. Clean lint filter as well as washing machine filter after each use. Work with parent(s) to learn operation.
10. No activity in common areas before 5AM. [Sleep is critical!]
11. No leaving the house by any means after bedtime and before 5 AM (see item #10)
[we have a house alarm that signals when a window is opened......]
[we have a house alarm that signals when a window is opened......]
12. Curfew is by 6 pm for dinner (this is negotiable depending on snack and dinner time)
13. Parent(s) bedroom/bathroom is off limits
13. Telephone - early morning cellphone calls (before 7 am) need to be made in your room; moderate your voice. House phone: No long distance or toll calls without prior permission.
14. Clean common areas after use. Pick up personal belongings and put them away in the evening before bed.
12. Do not borrow or take any item in the house without permission.
13. No visitors in the house without parent(s)' permission and presence.
14. Chores must be done per list.
15. No smoking/alcohol/illegal substances -- depending on your loved one's behavior(s) re brain function-altering substances
16. No diet soda or other foods with aspartame; caffeine only in the morning incl all beverages or Excedrin (the purpose of this rule is to help you sleep at nighttime). [On this point I believe that aspartame is toxic at the levels those with eating disorders often drink soda or add packets to coffee/tea and Excedrin has caffeine.]
17. Room and Board is $xx/week. Some might add points about gasoline allowance; car usage; allowance; missed appointments and charges for those if parent is paying; fines incurred, etc. or of course not charge for room and board.
MEALS
- Three meals a day plus two snacks. Breakfast and dinner taken here at the house unless dinner is scheduled at with others. Lunch here if you are here; pack a lunch or plan on purchasing lunch if away from the house. [This item is important for those who are helping in the re-feeding process.]
- No forbidden foods unless doctor prescribes specifically (e.g. gluten-free).
- We will work with you on the menu and intake to slowly re-gain weight to a healthy level [respect for the adult that s/he is]
CHORES LIST
1. Help with house and yard work as requested [depending on physical condition]
2. Keep the guest bathroom clean - floors, sinks, toilet – and personal belongings in appropriate places. Hang towels and washcloths neatly on the racks.
4. Keep your room clean - dust/vacuum as necessary
5. Change and wash your sheets at least once a week, wash your towels at least twice a week
CONSEQUENCES: Non-compliance will result in you being asked to leave the house and make your own living arrangements.
I agree to these rules: _________________________________ Date: ______________________
Genetically Programmed Body Size
If you missed this post written by "Kathy" and published on Dr. O'Toole's Blog, as well as linked on Laura Collins' blog, the above link will take you to another opportunity to take a look at one mother's struggle to accept her daughter's genetically programmed body size or set point.
I remember when I was finally recovering from my eating disorder in my early thirties, I realized that I was staying healthier and thinking much more clearly when my weight stayed above a certain point. [I try hard on this blog not to mention numbers as that can be triggering for some readers.]
When I dropped below that point, either bronchitis or a solid cold would take over and intellectually, my abilities seemed less "there." My body spoke to me.
Even later, when I remarried and reached my later forties, my doctor was jubilant (no kidding) when I finally reached the point that he believed, based on research, etc. was best for me.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
A Map of the Brain
Thanks to the "magic" of Facebook and social networking, I was alerted to the existence of a lecture titled "A Map of the Brain" by Allan Jones on TED.
Great way to launch one's knowledge about the brain.
Go to this link. You will, I hope, enjoy a fascinating 15 minutes or so lecture.
Great way to launch one's knowledge about the brain.
Go to this link. You will, I hope, enjoy a fascinating 15 minutes or so lecture.
Consensus Science - an upcoming conference
During the FEAST conference there was some discussion of the need to develop consensus around points and procedures about eating disorders.
There will be a conference on this topic - Consensus Science - in Silver Spring, Maryland at the end of this month. Here's a link to the announcement. Here's introductory information about the conference. Technical, I know, but for those doing research, this is an important related topic.
Collaborations between industry, regulatory agencies, and academia are generating consensus on the value of innovative tools for drug development (data standards, open databases, biomarkers, patient-reported outcome measures, quantitative disease progression models, clinical imaging, and others). These tools will accelerate the development of efficacious medicines with optimal risk profiles.
This cross-sector conference will feature state-of-the-art drug development tools while reviewing the lessons learned from Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and scanning the landscape for the most pressing needs in drug and diagnostic development.
There will be a conference on this topic - Consensus Science - in Silver Spring, Maryland at the end of this month. Here's a link to the announcement. Here's introductory information about the conference. Technical, I know, but for those doing research, this is an important related topic.
Collaborations between industry, regulatory agencies, and academia are generating consensus on the value of innovative tools for drug development (data standards, open databases, biomarkers, patient-reported outcome measures, quantitative disease progression models, clinical imaging, and others). These tools will accelerate the development of efficacious medicines with optimal risk profiles.
This cross-sector conference will feature state-of-the-art drug development tools while reviewing the lessons learned from Public Private Partnerships (PPPs) and scanning the landscape for the most pressing needs in drug and diagnostic development.
The Family is the Key
June Alexander and her her co-presenter on ‘Hope at Every Age’ at the 2011 NEDA Conference, Assistant Professor Renee Rienecke Hoste, from the University of Chicago, explains why family involvement is important.
This is one of the best wrap-ups I've read re Family-Based Therapy and why the involvement of the Family is so very important.
Wednesday, November 9, 2011
Guest Post By Marjie Ruth - We're Still Where We Are!
I enjoy Marjie's posts. Her offering each week or so always makes me think. I thought this post was especially poignant since I just returned from the F.E.A.S.T. conference at which, of course, everyone was wondering where we are......
"Oh, Daddy, we're still where we are!"
~ young girl sitting behind me on the plane
~ young girl sitting behind me on the plane
Perhaps you're wondering about the unusual quote that I've started out with this week. As we were returning home from a trip recently, there was a young girl, probably about 5 or 6 years old sitting behind me. It was obviously her first flight, and she was understandably excited. When she first sat down, I had to chuckle as she announced to her dad that her ears were bothering her already. And this was while half the passengers had yet to board! She had obviously been told what to expect and in her excitement she was experiencing "anticipatory ear pressure". It was about 2 hours into the flight when she raised her window shade to look out once again, and upon seeing that we were still flying amidst the clouds she announced in exasperation, "Oh, Daddy, we're still where we are!". I smiled at her words and the succinct way she had managed to capture her perception so innocently and accurately in that phrase. By all appearances if one were to judge by the scene out the window, we had not made any progress at all in our travels . Flying along at 23,000 feet (or whatever), there were no familiar landmarks to help us determine where we were, how far we had gone, or in what direction we were headed. The more I thought about what she said, the more I was intrigued by the words.
We're still where we are! State it with desperation, and it becomes a cry for help. Where are things headed? When will we see progress? How will we know if things are going in the right direction? How do we get out of here? These are all questions that we ask at one time or another when dealing with a loved one and their eating disorder. It's foreign territory devoid of the usual landmarks. Perhaps that's why we often struggle so to keep the usual markers of progress in our lives. "Treatment is important, but let's not let it interfere with school (or career or family)," we think. These are things that define us and tell us where we are and where we're going. It may seem frightening to us to let them go. What with this horrible addiction already causing so much tension and anguish, we may find ourselves clinging to those "markers" in our lives. While the emotion is understandable, there may be some danger there. A person driven to such a self destructive behavior as a coping mechanism is most definitely experiencing some serious emotional pain in their life. It may very well be that the marker (school, career, friends, family dynamics, etc) we want to maintain is an integral factor in the mental turmoil they're struggling to deal with, albeit in an unhealthy way. The important guide here is to not let our own emotional needs become a detriment to therapy and recovery.
We're still where we are! Cry it with exasperation, and it is the voice of frustration. Why did this happen? What was the cause? How much longer will it last? Where can we find help? Why isn't she (or he) getting any better? Why can't she/he just eat? I don't think I can take much more of this! For sure, living with someone who is in the throes of an eating disorder is a very tough place to be. Just like the little girl who could hardly wait to get to her Florida destination and was frustrated when she looked out the window as it seemed that nothing had changed and she wasn't any closer than before, we are desperate and impatient for healing and a return to a more normal life. For the little girl, life was going to be very good when the plane landed. We find ourselves thinking in a similar pattern: if they can just get over this disorder, our lives will be good again. We may find that we think in terms of life before the disorder (the time before we knew that our loved one had become addicted), life as it is now with the monster that is the disorder creating such misery and havoc for everyone, and life as it will be (back to just like before hopefully or at least much better than now) after the disorder. Again, this is an understandable outlook but not necessarily a helpful one for at least two reasons. Just as the Zen philosopher would tell us that no man can put his hand in the same stream twice (because the water is always moving and changing, it is always a different stream), life in the future is always different from the past if only because we have experienced time in between. When dealing with something that develops at such a deep emotionally subconscious level and becomes both mentally and physically entrenched, even 100% recovery cannot erase the history of the battle. Nor should we want it to as it's the learning that occurs through successfully fighting for recovery that enables the victim to master the steps to maintain that recovery. Therefore, to put it in my own Zen-like words: better to not waste energy wishing for things to return to past; instead use energy to direct mind to learn from past, apply lessons to present knowing that it will become what is to be.
We're still where we are! Now, try saying it with a bit of awe and wonder. "We're still where we are." Do you know where that is? If not, all the more reason to slow down and figure it out. A big issue dealt with in therapy is learning to stay in the moment. That's because either projecting into the future or clinging to the past has not been healthy for them. Looking ahead, especially if one is at all depressed, can be extremely frightening and debilitating. Can't understand that? Well, good for you as it means you're probably not suffering from depression, but please don't let that prevent you from having empathy for those who are not so lucky. It's common for those with an eating disorder to also be diagnosed with depression. (It's my hunch that often in such cases it was untreated depression that led to the eating disorder as a coping mechanism, but that's just my theory.) And for someone depressed, the future is just a black hole looming ahead. An unrealistic longing for the past is also a sign of trouble. This longing to be back in a safe time and place can trigger an irrational desire to remain childlike, thus avoiding the dangers inherent in dealing with "adulthood" in our society. This is part of why recovery encourages staying in the moment. Another reason is that the Eating Disorder (ED) likes to make things complicated, thereby insuring the need for its place in their lives, by making their thoughts all confused and anxious with worries about the future and painful reminders about a past they no longer live in. The ED wants life to seem very complicated and its disordered solution the only obvious answer. Staying in the moment is a way to help defuse the disorder by keeping life simpler, one moment at a time. And this is a strategy we can all gain from if we apply it to our own lives. Think about it: when your loved one does something that seems so very disordered, if we project that ahead in what we see as a logical progression, we can find ourselves in despair. But if we isolate that moment--take it as the single incident it is and admit that it's our fear that makes us worry about the future, and refuse to give in to the folly of projecting ahead--we cut that moment down to size and bring our own response in to scale. This "downsizing" to the reality of the moment can then help us to avoid contributing to the disorder through our own emotional acting out. We're still where we are, right now, whether we like it or not. And especially when we don't like it, life is easier to handle on a moment by moment basis. In this way we avoid being overcome by despair.
Well, we're still where we are, and maybe that's just where we need to be right now.
marjie Ruth
(727)244-9011 (c)
As always, feel free to share this email with anyone who might have the least bit of interest in it. Keep my name and email address with it please, so that anyone who reads it will know who is responsible for the thoughts expressed here. If you are receiving this and would rather not be bothered, just email me and I'll take your name off the list. Thanks.
Monday, November 7, 2011
Report - Day Two - The First Annual F.E.A.S.T. Symposium: The Map Ahead - November 3-4, 2011
Following breakfast on Friday morning, we all moved on to the ballroom to hear remarks by a panel of four women representing the United States (Colleen Wise), the UK (Rachel Polonsky and Maria FinnisChataway) and Australia (Bridget Bonnin) moderated by Susan Ringwood, the Chief Executive of BEAT as well as a member of FEAST's Professional Advisory Panel. Their goal was to "put parent concerns and assets on the map: the law, healthcare policy, advocacy."
(For a look at everyone serving as 2015 board members of F.E.A.S.T., go to this link.)
After introducing themselves, each spoke of the idiosyncracies of their country's treatment policies, insurance coverage, availability of health care as well as level of care. Insurance was not an issue in the UK or Australia whereas trying to find funds to get treatment for loved ones in the United States was described as a totally different (as we know) situation. Colleen brought the house down by remarking she regretted that she was the only one on the panel without an accent. Her remark actually cut the tension for we were all in for an emotional ride over the next hour while each described her personal experience. I could see heads nodding around the room as we identified with the journeys being presented. I could not help but cry when Colleen articulately described what happened in her household and to her daughter who was a healthy and happy teenager until she developed anorexia.
As has happened before and I know will continue to occur, we again were reminded of the different ways that eating disorders appear with or without prior observable behaviors such as anxiety and with or without the profile that many refer to including perfectionism, obsession to detail, high-functioning, self-criticism and other traits.
Following a much-needed break, we all regrouped and were introduced to Laura Discipio (ANAD), Chevese Turner (BEDA), and Doug Bunnell (formerly NEDA; also Renfrew). Laura Collins set the stage for an open forum with several questions:
This discussion could have continued for the rest of the day, I think. It also strikes me, as one who used to lead discussions like this, that future meetings might include a white board or large pad of paper, easel and marker to quickly write down a brief summary of different points made. A suggestion for next year?!
This intense hour was followed by business meetings to which symposium participants were invited. These included an International Registry Project, a Medical Education Task Force, and Australian and UK Task Forces. I hope progress reports will be issued. I was particularly interested in the Medical Education Task Force but needed to take care of some personal business and could not attend.
Following lunch we were summoned by chimes to the ballroom at precisely 12:55 pm to be seated to welcome Dr. Thomas Insel, Director of the United States National Institute of Mental Health and our keynote speaker.
Dr. Insel began by discussing the National Institutes and Centers of which there are 22, all funded by our Federal Government. Their charge is to support research for all medically causes illnesses; $31 billion of taxpayer funds are invested annually. The National Institute of Mental Health focuses on the research and SAMHSA provides the services. Specifically,the mission of NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery, and cure. I've provided links here to both organizations since a better understanding of their role and mission will guide those of us who need to know to whom to go for what.
Just going to the responsibilities of the Office of the Director is an eye-opening experience! And the link to the current state of eating disorders is also interesting. Many of Dr. Insel's comments can be found on these links as well as in his blog. Dr. Insel's recent essay titled No Health Without Mental Health is especially poignant and refers to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act discussed yesterday by Jeanine Cogan of the Eating Disorder Coalition. Brain Development is his latest topic.
Having highlighted many document that provide the information Dr. Insel drew upon during his talk, I'll list some of his points I found salient to where we're going. He noted,
We are on the cusp of a major revolution in the understanding of mental illness and specifically of illnesses such as eating disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and autism. These are biologically based brain disorders.
One might refer to brain disorders as circuit or functional problems; an arrhythmia of the brain.
These are developmental disorders, as well. We need to study and get a better understanding of what happens in the brain when a person develops one of these disorders especially since these disorders predominantly begin in young people with identifiable onset as early as 14 and 75 percent by the age of 24. Since these disorders appear while a young person's brain is still developing, what does the change do to the brain? to the normal development of the brain?
Other illnesses progress along trajectories. Often, the symptoms we observe are the last things we know about as the brain continues to adapt until a severe stage of the disease emerges. Clearly, early intervention will yield the best outcome. For example, in schizophrenia most boys develop the presence of psychosis by the age of 19; girls about the age of 21-22. Psychosis is a late stage.
Are there similar trajectories for eating disorders? Are there identifiable cognitive changes? biomarkers? risks that one can highlight and address? (Interestingly, a news item today notes Computer analysis of brain scans could help predict how serious or long term a psychotic patient's illness may become and help doctors make more accurate decisions about how best to treat them, researchers said on Monday. In a study in the journal Psychological Medicine, scientists from King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry and University College London's computer science department found that using computer algorithms to analyze MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) brain scans can predict a patient's outcome. "This is the first step toward being able to use brain imaging to provide tangible benefit to patients affected by psychosis," said Paola Dazzan of King's, who co-led the study.)
The study of genomics and epigenomics will yield breakthroughs within the next five years in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, and the preparation of the workforce.
Re diagnosis, previously mental illness was diagnosed by consensus. We are moving towards gaining the knowledge of what underlies those behaviors and symptoms. An illustration of advances made in the field of medicine includes the fact that there are now six types of breast cancer, all treated differently. Antibodies are developed as early as the age of 2 that lead to diabetes later on.
Believes that there may be a wide spectrum of eating disorders for which different kinds of treatment may be necessary.
Frankly, I was delighted by this observation coming from Dr. Insel since I speculated about this on my blog a few months ago reflecting on scientific knowledge provided to me by Martie Fankhauser, a neuropsychiatric pharmacist who I consulted when I wanted to learn more about the brain from a neurochemical point of view. Since there has been no new medication for many years to treat ED, non-medication therapy is really important. [Note that the current estimate to develop a new drug is $1 billion.]
Lock and Le Grange have demonstrated that one can turn an eating disorder on its head using FBT. Families are part of the solution, for sure. Fifty percent of those who use their method recover in one year; what about the other 50 percent. Can this be scaled up in a larger study to understand why?
Re training - many in the field of eating disorders do not understand the concept of evidence-based treatment nor is their training scientifically based. Change must happen. Retraining must occur. Perhaps an entirely new discipline in medicine will develop related to brain disorders - Clinical Neuroscience, for example. Required re-accreditation in the field of eating disorders may be a possibility. There is a general lack of understanding of the severity of these diseases. Expertise is needed in the training of patients to cognitively override the diseases of eating disorders.
Dr.Insel closed his presentation by noting that although the field has grown tremendously, much remains unknown. [Some were able to capture his talk thanks to the live videostreaming that occurred during the entire conference. At least one section is reproduced on the Around the Dinner Table website.]
[While trawling the internet today - 12/6/2011 - I came across this vimeo thanks to the provision of it to the public by Jane Cawley. Here Dr. Insel notes several of the points he touched on in his talk.]
Dr. Julie O'Toole, MD, founder and medical director of the Kartini Clinic, author of Give Food a Chance and a member of the F.E.A.S.T. Professional Advisory Panel moderated a panel brought together to determine where parents want the eating disorder world to go. Dr. Insel was joined by Jeanine Cogan (EDC), Susan Ringwood (BEAT), Stephanie Bauer (Academy for Eating Disorders), and Dr. Richard Kreipe (AAP, Professor of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine).
Question: How do we convey the severity of this disease without highlighting the usual sensationalistic photos and descriptions?
What other steps can be taken?
This discussion evolved into somewhat of a free-for-all and many comments were offered. The transcript will undoubtedly add much value to the final report on the symposium.
A highlight of the afternoon was the announcement by the Board of a new "Magic Plate Award." Laura Collins was surprised and very touched to be the first recipient.
Following another break and the raffle winner announcements (books and manuals donated by Gurze Books), a surprising number of people (given the late hour and travel requirements of many attending the conference) gathered in a smaller room to hear the stories of four recovered people who answered questions about their experiences including what helped and what didn't. Carrie Arnold, Olympia Collins, Katie Cullinane, and June Alexander shared much about their lives when they were fighting eating disorders and offered solutions towards recovery based on what worked for them. Questions ranged from family relationships to negotiating college education as well as treatment. Each presented a different journey, a helpful offering towards understanding the variability of eating disorders.
I needed to leave early to join my son for dinner at Union Station. He traveled by train down from New York City to spend some time with me - a wonderful surprise.
I look forward to next year's conference and applaud Laura Collins and other F.E.A.S.T. organizers who put together an educational and progressive experience. I've never attended a conference quite like this before and am sure that much will evolve as a result of the discussions - formal and informal - that occurred.
(For a look at everyone serving as 2015 board members of F.E.A.S.T., go to this link.)
After introducing themselves, each spoke of the idiosyncracies of their country's treatment policies, insurance coverage, availability of health care as well as level of care. Insurance was not an issue in the UK or Australia whereas trying to find funds to get treatment for loved ones in the United States was described as a totally different (as we know) situation. Colleen brought the house down by remarking she regretted that she was the only one on the panel without an accent. Her remark actually cut the tension for we were all in for an emotional ride over the next hour while each described her personal experience. I could see heads nodding around the room as we identified with the journeys being presented. I could not help but cry when Colleen articulately described what happened in her household and to her daughter who was a healthy and happy teenager until she developed anorexia.
As has happened before and I know will continue to occur, we again were reminded of the different ways that eating disorders appear with or without prior observable behaviors such as anxiety and with or without the profile that many refer to including perfectionism, obsession to detail, high-functioning, self-criticism and other traits.
Following a much-needed break, we all regrouped and were introduced to Laura Discipio (ANAD), Chevese Turner (BEDA), and Doug Bunnell (formerly NEDA; also Renfrew). Laura Collins set the stage for an open forum with several questions:
- Why can't we all just get along?
- Do parents have a special role in identifying and challenging ideas in the professional world?
- How can parent activists work with professional and patient activists?
- Whose shoulders do we stand on? (learning from long-time activists)
- Where the the new parent activists going to come from?
This discussion could have continued for the rest of the day, I think. It also strikes me, as one who used to lead discussions like this, that future meetings might include a white board or large pad of paper, easel and marker to quickly write down a brief summary of different points made. A suggestion for next year?!
This intense hour was followed by business meetings to which symposium participants were invited. These included an International Registry Project, a Medical Education Task Force, and Australian and UK Task Forces. I hope progress reports will be issued. I was particularly interested in the Medical Education Task Force but needed to take care of some personal business and could not attend.
Following lunch we were summoned by chimes to the ballroom at precisely 12:55 pm to be seated to welcome Dr. Thomas Insel, Director of the United States National Institute of Mental Health and our keynote speaker.
Dr. Insel began by discussing the National Institutes and Centers of which there are 22, all funded by our Federal Government. Their charge is to support research for all medically causes illnesses; $31 billion of taxpayer funds are invested annually. The National Institute of Mental Health focuses on the research and SAMHSA provides the services. Specifically,the mission of NIMH is to transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research, paving the way for prevention, recovery, and cure. I've provided links here to both organizations since a better understanding of their role and mission will guide those of us who need to know to whom to go for what.
Just going to the responsibilities of the Office of the Director is an eye-opening experience! And the link to the current state of eating disorders is also interesting. Many of Dr. Insel's comments can be found on these links as well as in his blog. Dr. Insel's recent essay titled No Health Without Mental Health is especially poignant and refers to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act discussed yesterday by Jeanine Cogan of the Eating Disorder Coalition. Brain Development is his latest topic.
Having highlighted many document that provide the information Dr. Insel drew upon during his talk, I'll list some of his points I found salient to where we're going. He noted,
We are on the cusp of a major revolution in the understanding of mental illness and specifically of illnesses such as eating disorders, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and autism. These are biologically based brain disorders.
One might refer to brain disorders as circuit or functional problems; an arrhythmia of the brain.
These are developmental disorders, as well. We need to study and get a better understanding of what happens in the brain when a person develops one of these disorders especially since these disorders predominantly begin in young people with identifiable onset as early as 14 and 75 percent by the age of 24. Since these disorders appear while a young person's brain is still developing, what does the change do to the brain? to the normal development of the brain?
Other illnesses progress along trajectories. Often, the symptoms we observe are the last things we know about as the brain continues to adapt until a severe stage of the disease emerges. Clearly, early intervention will yield the best outcome. For example, in schizophrenia most boys develop the presence of psychosis by the age of 19; girls about the age of 21-22. Psychosis is a late stage.
Are there similar trajectories for eating disorders? Are there identifiable cognitive changes? biomarkers? risks that one can highlight and address? (Interestingly, a news item today notes Computer analysis of brain scans could help predict how serious or long term a psychotic patient's illness may become and help doctors make more accurate decisions about how best to treat them, researchers said on Monday. In a study in the journal Psychological Medicine, scientists from King's College London's Institute of Psychiatry and University College London's computer science department found that using computer algorithms to analyze MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) brain scans can predict a patient's outcome. "This is the first step toward being able to use brain imaging to provide tangible benefit to patients affected by psychosis," said Paola Dazzan of King's, who co-led the study.)
The study of genomics and epigenomics will yield breakthroughs within the next five years in the areas of diagnosis, treatment, and the preparation of the workforce.
Re diagnosis, previously mental illness was diagnosed by consensus. We are moving towards gaining the knowledge of what underlies those behaviors and symptoms. An illustration of advances made in the field of medicine includes the fact that there are now six types of breast cancer, all treated differently. Antibodies are developed as early as the age of 2 that lead to diabetes later on.
Believes that there may be a wide spectrum of eating disorders for which different kinds of treatment may be necessary.
Frankly, I was delighted by this observation coming from Dr. Insel since I speculated about this on my blog a few months ago reflecting on scientific knowledge provided to me by Martie Fankhauser, a neuropsychiatric pharmacist who I consulted when I wanted to learn more about the brain from a neurochemical point of view. Since there has been no new medication for many years to treat ED, non-medication therapy is really important. [Note that the current estimate to develop a new drug is $1 billion.]
Lock and Le Grange have demonstrated that one can turn an eating disorder on its head using FBT. Families are part of the solution, for sure. Fifty percent of those who use their method recover in one year; what about the other 50 percent. Can this be scaled up in a larger study to understand why?
Re training - many in the field of eating disorders do not understand the concept of evidence-based treatment nor is their training scientifically based. Change must happen. Retraining must occur. Perhaps an entirely new discipline in medicine will develop related to brain disorders - Clinical Neuroscience, for example. Required re-accreditation in the field of eating disorders may be a possibility. There is a general lack of understanding of the severity of these diseases. Expertise is needed in the training of patients to cognitively override the diseases of eating disorders.
Dr.Insel closed his presentation by noting that although the field has grown tremendously, much remains unknown. [Some were able to capture his talk thanks to the live videostreaming that occurred during the entire conference. At least one section is reproduced on the Around the Dinner Table website.]
[While trawling the internet today - 12/6/2011 - I came across this vimeo thanks to the provision of it to the public by Jane Cawley. Here Dr. Insel notes several of the points he touched on in his talk.]
Dr. Julie O'Toole, MD, founder and medical director of the Kartini Clinic, author of Give Food a Chance and a member of the F.E.A.S.T. Professional Advisory Panel moderated a panel brought together to determine where parents want the eating disorder world to go. Dr. Insel was joined by Jeanine Cogan (EDC), Susan Ringwood (BEAT), Stephanie Bauer (Academy for Eating Disorders), and Dr. Richard Kreipe (AAP, Professor of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine).
Question: How do we convey the severity of this disease without highlighting the usual sensationalistic photos and descriptions?
- Having data and stories of patients and family members.
- We need a big media push emphasizing eating disorders as a public health issue
- Our common task is to get people healthy first and foremost
- The field must partner with parents and listen to parental concerns.
- Keep the best interest of the child/young adult/adult in mind.
What other steps can be taken?
- Create a Consensus Panel
- Develop Criteria for a Center of Excellence
- Study Sibling Risk
- Need scientific agency media push
- Train more pediatricians/adolescent specialists
- Distribute the revised AED booklet as widely as possible
- Disseminate techniques, knowledge and methods to parents
This discussion evolved into somewhat of a free-for-all and many comments were offered. The transcript will undoubtedly add much value to the final report on the symposium.
A highlight of the afternoon was the announcement by the Board of a new "Magic Plate Award." Laura Collins was surprised and very touched to be the first recipient.
Following another break and the raffle winner announcements (books and manuals donated by Gurze Books), a surprising number of people (given the late hour and travel requirements of many attending the conference) gathered in a smaller room to hear the stories of four recovered people who answered questions about their experiences including what helped and what didn't. Carrie Arnold, Olympia Collins, Katie Cullinane, and June Alexander shared much about their lives when they were fighting eating disorders and offered solutions towards recovery based on what worked for them. Questions ranged from family relationships to negotiating college education as well as treatment. Each presented a different journey, a helpful offering towards understanding the variability of eating disorders.
I needed to leave early to join my son for dinner at Union Station. He traveled by train down from New York City to spend some time with me - a wonderful surprise.
I look forward to next year's conference and applaud Laura Collins and other F.E.A.S.T. organizers who put together an educational and progressive experience. I've never attended a conference quite like this before and am sure that much will evolve as a result of the discussions - formal and informal - that occurred.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)