Welcome

When I created this blog, I was "getting on" in my early sixties, hence the blog name. However, my adult daughter's eating disorder and co-occurring emotional dysregulation disorder and other co-morbidities - ongoing for about 33 years - became and was our focus as we attempted to help her get into recovery. By learning about, reflecting on, reading about, attending conferences and writing about eating and brain disorders, I created a place to blog what I've learned. I hope this blog will be of use to others, especially families of and adult sufferers themselves to help them get into recovery. I update posts from time and the update date will be present at the top of the post.

Sadly, my daughter passed away in early October 2021 mainly because her body became so malnourished that she was immunocompromised, contracted a severe infection that was not properly addressed during an earlier hospital stay the month before, and developed an overwhelming non-covid pneumonia following surgery to save her life. I believe she should have been able to receive palliative care but Arizona, our country, and even the professionals trained in the treatment of eating disorders, particularly anorexia, are not "there" yet. I address the issue of palliative care in a recent post below, initially written in November 2021. I am not a certified eating disorder specialist. I am an Expert by Experience and college-educated with a BA in Community Work with an additional certificate in a one-year program in Business Administration from the same institution.

I am passionate about all of this because, as Shakespeare wrote in The Taming of the Shrew, Act 4, Scene 3: "My tongue will tell the anger [and sadness] of my heart or else my heart, concealing it, will break. And, rather than it shall, I will be free even to the uttermost, as I please in words."[2016]

Travel Guide

If you're new to my blog, I recommend you begin on the right side and take a look at the "Of Note" offerings. Read Dr. Cynthia Bulik's recent published interview (5/4/22) "Rethinking Eating Disorders" if you want to print an easy-to-understand professional's expert opinion about anorexia for your family doctor or the therapist. [Early intervention is absolutely critical. For those whose eating disorder is categorized as entrenched or severe and enduring, read the editorial comment by Stephen Touyz and Philipa Hay for a new approach about treatment. It is possible for your loved one to recover! I have also attached a link here for additional papers on the subject of severe and entrenched eating disorders. If you are a family member or friend of an adult with an eating disorder and have been at this for awhile, I refer you to the posts within the title "Adult Eating Disorders and Recovery Tools" found in the Index on the right hand side of this site. As well, in the "Of Note" section take a look at those posts with an asterisk. If you're a parent and need support, look for posts in the Index about parent support or parent toolbox. In my opinion, the best book to buy, to refer to constantly and to share with members of the medical/psychiatric profession is "Sick Enough: A Guide to the Medical Complications of Eating Disorders" by Jennifer L. Gaudiani MD, CEDS, FAED. "Dr. Gaudiani aims to improve medical diagnosis and treatment, motivate recovery, and validate the lived experiences of individuals of all body shapes and sizes, while firmly rejecting dieting culture." I recommend two groups who will support you on your journey - F.E.A.S.T and the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Both maintain websites and Facebook private groups.

Tuesday, March 29, 2016

Treatment for Adults: A Grown-Up Approach to Treating Anorexia by Carrie Arnold published in Mosaic Science 3/29/2016

I am very excited to share this article that was published today by Mosaic Science (3/29/2016) along with the ability and HTML text to republish it here. By going to the link I have provided above, readers can also pick up the article, share it on Facebook,  email it to friends and colleagues and even email it to their favorite publications. Finding appropriate treatment for an adult with anorexia is difficult. Getting it is even harder. So much information is in here including historical background, the latest understanding about this disorder, what happens in the brain of those with this disorder, how this disease affects the behavior of those with this disorder, and so forth. Embedded in the article are important links including Carrie Arnold's personal experience with anorexia (How I Manage My Eating Disorder). Carrie Arnold reveals what I, as a person who is in recovery from anorexia (first) and bulimia (later) for more than almost 40 years know: that is, the tendencies continue to be there due to genetics and environmental triggers. Understanding what is going on is an important clue and motivator to want to pursue recovery. This article by Carrie Arnold and the work of Dr. Walter Kaye and Laura Hill, PhD, opens that door.

************





Heather Purdin had run out of options. Aged 33, she had been suffering from anorexia nervosa for more than two decades and her weight had plummeted to that of a small child, an all-time low for her. Her case worker, out of frustration and desperation, suggested hospice care as a way to spend her remaining days in relative comfort. But for the first time in years, Heather was sure of one thing: she desperately wanted to live.

Treating anorexia, which is characterised by self-starvation and an inability to maintain an adequate body weight, seems absurdly simple on the surface: just eat and gain weight. It’s something Heather and the millions of others afflicted by eating disorders have heard countless times. The problem is that it’s never that simple. Heather has long since lost track of the number of times she has been admitted to hospital for low body weight, electrolyte imbalances caused by starvation or self-induced vomiting, or thoughts of suicide. In hospital she gains weight, but as soon as she is discharged she promptly returns to her old ways and loses what little weight she has gained. And so for more than 20 years, she has remained hopelessly, incurably, stuck.

Up to one in five people with chronic anorexia may die as a result of their illness, either due to the direct effects of starvation and malnutrition or due to suicide, making it the deadliest of all psychiatric disorders. Although scientists have made tremendous progress in decoding the underlying biology of eating disorders and in finding ways to intervene in cases of teenage anorexia before the disorder becomes chronic, this hasn’t translated into effective treatments for adults like Heather.

A chance posting on Facebook last fall, however, brought Heather the first breath of hope she had felt in years. In Ohio, there was an experimental five-day intensive programme to help adults with anorexia. What made this one different was that it used the latest neurobiology research to mould its goals as well as how its treatment was delivered. And since research confirms that most patients struggle to make changes to their entrenched behaviours on their own, patients also had to invite up to four support people to join them on the residential programme. Heather asked her father and her sister, and began raising the funds to fly them all to Ohio.

“I need this to work,” she said. “I have nothing else to try.”

Despite its reputation as a quintessentially modern disorder, anorexia is nothing new. Historians believe that many of the ‘fasting saints’ of the Middle Ages had anorexia. The first medical report of the illness appeared in 1689, written by London physician Richard Morton, who described it as “a Nervous Consumption” caused by “Sadness and anxious Cares”.

Even as recently as the 1970s, anorexia remained something of a clinical oddity – a disease that doctors rarely saw, let alone had a clue how to treat. When psychologist Laura Hill saw her first anorexia patient at a university counselling centre back in 1979, she had never even heard of the disorder: “Her father was in the science department there and I had to ask him what anorexia was,” recalls Hill. “He told me she was unable to gain weight, afraid of food.”

Rates of anorexia had been steadily climbing since the 1950s, but it wasn’t until the death of singer Karen Carpenter in 1983 that the disorder became a household word. She died from heart failure due to anorexia nervosa, and all of a sudden newspaper stories and after-school TV specials began to feature teenage girls “dying to be thin”. Besides highlighting the spectacle of a healthy, attractive young girl’s determination to starve herself, the storylines usually focused on the family dysfunction that psychologists believed lay at the heart of the disorder. Parents were told not to be the food police, that anorexia was a misguided search for control. Only when they let their child be fully in control of their own life would the anorexia resolve.

Psychiatrist Walter Kaye wasn’t convinced. Despite not having done research into eating disorders before, he had been asked to help finish an anorexia study for the US National Institutes of Health in the early 1980s. While talking with the participants, he noticed something unusual.

“I was just kind of struck by how homogenous the symptoms were,” he says. Because the patients seemed so similar in terms of symptoms and temperament, he believed there had to be something in their biology that was causing anorexia – and he dedicated himself to finding out what it was.
In the early 1980s, anorexia had been seen by the medical community as a deliberate decision by a petulant teenage girl: she was selfish, vain, wilful. Since she had chosen to become ill, she simply needed to choose to get better. She needed to become a fully formed individual, to separate from her family and rebel against the cultural ideal of thinness at all costs.

How I manage my eating disorder

Scientific research by Kaye and others, however, exploded every aspect of this stereotype (not least that anorexia only affects girls) and completely changed how we think about the condition. Psychologists like Laura Hill had to rethink their whole approach: “Many times, I want to call up all my old patients and apologise for getting so much backwards,” she says.

Hill began to keep a file full of notes about what she thought was causing anorexia, what her patients believed, what seemed to work and what didn’t. After a few years, she entered a PhD programme to better help her patients. But even with several research articles to her name and, ultimately, decades working at the forefront of treating and researching eating disorders, she realised that the treatment advances weren’t reaching adults with anorexia. She wasn’t the only one. Across the field, psychologists, psychiatrists and dietitians have noted that treatment outcomes for adults with anorexia remain abysmally low. Less than half recover fully, another third show some improvement, but the rest remain chronically ill.

“They go for many years, and they’ve relapsed over and over again, and they have the highest risk of dying,” says Kaye. “I think all of us are feeling that this is a serious, often deadly disorder for these people, and we don’t have good approaches, and we don’t understand enough about the causes.”

For adolescents with anorexia, a ground-breaking treatment developed at the Maudsley Hospital in London in the 1980s called family-based treatment (FBT) has significantly improved short-term recovery outcomes. It puts parents temporarily in charge of making food and exercise decisions for their child and places a priority on normalising weight and eating habits. In a randomised clinical trial published in 2010, around half of teens treated with FBT met criteria for full recovery after a year, compared to 23 per cent of teens receiving standard treatment.

Nothing has been remotely that successful for adults with anorexia, and there’s no easy explanation as to why. One reason may be that adults have simply been sicker for longer, says Angela Guarda, Director of the Eating Disorders Program at Johns Hopkins University: “The longer you have anorexia, the more anorexia creates physiological changes in the body and the brain that then create a self-sustaining cycle. You do it today because you did it yesterday, no longer because you decided to go on the Atkins diet when you were 15 or because your coach said something to you or you broke up with a boyfriend and you decided to lose weight. It’s no longer about that.”

[[{"fid":"3499","view_mode":"image_portrait_right_align","fields":{"format":"image_portrait_right_align"},"type":"media","link_text":null,"attributes":{"alt":"Anorexia brain spiral Magnus Voll Mathiassen","height":333,"width":350,"class":"media-element file-image-portrait-right-align"}}]]

As well, many people with anorexia don’t grasp that they are, in fact, sick. While parents generally sign their children into treatment, that power vanishes when the child turns 18. Adult patients can also stop treatment if it gets too difficult – and it often does, because challenging the behaviours associated with eating disorders can create tidal waves of anxiety. A long-term, chronic eating disorder often ends up alienating friends and family, the very people who tend to push their ill loved one into treatment and support them through the recovery process.

Clinicians, like their patients, are desperate for something better, some way not only to help adults with anorexia normalise their eating and gain weight, but also to help them stay well. “In anorexia, you get their weight up and they go home straight from inpatient [where] they’re fed from a tray, and they’re expected to know how to eat in a restaurant, eat in a cafeteria, eat in social settings, when they haven’t been eating with anyone for a decade,” Guarda says.

On a warm spring weekend in 2006, Laura Hill stopped in the middle of mowing her lawn. She had spent the morning reading one of Walter Kaye’s articles on the neurobiology of anorexia, and was familiar with how Kaye and his colleague Stephanie Knatz were beginning to use neurobiology in designing new treatments for adolescents. It occurred to Hill that she could do something similar for her adult patients.

She dashed inside to grab a pad of paper and a pencil, where she scribbled a few notes before returning to her lawn. Several passes later, she had another insight and again stopped mowing to add to her notes. This went on all afternoon. It took until dusk to finish the mowing, but by then, as well as a neatly cut lawn, Hill also had the outline of a new type of adult anorexia treatment that would harness the strengths of people with the disorder and try to compensate for their weaknesses.

She continued to work on the outline, asking her patients at the Center for Balanced Living in Ohio for input on what they found helpful. A few years later, she teamed up with Kaye and Knatz, who further refined the idea based on their experiences at the University of California, San Diego. There, they had had remarkable success with a five-day intensive FBT programme for adolescents. Rather than seeing someone once a week, which might not be enough to be effective, or taking them away from their family and putting them in an artificial environment for a residential programme, they had insisted that the family come and stay too. Encouragingly, some young adults – living at home or supported by their parents – had also taken part, suggesting that this format could work with an older crowd as well.

“As opposed to having people step in for an hour and talk about what happened over the week, we’re actually seeing what happens live, in vivo. That gives us the possibility to intervene in vivo, as opposed to coaching people on what they should do ‘when circumstances come up’,” says Knatz.

In 2013, Hill, Knatz and Kaye applied for a grant from the US National Eating Disorders Association to fund a pilot study of what they called Neurobiologically Enhanced With Family/Friends Eating Disorder Trait Response (NEW FED TR). Every aspect of the programme was based on what researchers understood about what happens in the brain of someone with anorexia, the goal being not just to improve treatment but also to reduce blame and guilt among sufferers and families. To that end, NEW FED TR would involve care givers and loved ones as an integral part of treatment, creating a team that could work to fight the eating disorder together. Responsibility for recovery would remain firmly in each client’s hands, but some aspects of recovery that tend to be sticking points for adults with anorexia could be outsourced to their support people as needed.

On an unusually mild Monday morning in December 2015, Heather Purdin was fiddling with the ponytail securing her dark brown hair, just as she always does when she’s nervous. It was a short drive from the hotel, across the freeway interchange to the back of a wooded business park. Her body mass index (BMI) was very low now – all muscle and softness stripped from her body, leaving only sinew and bone. A baggy shirt and scarf couldn’t conceal how ill she was. But she was not on her way to a hospital or a hospice. Flanked by her father, sister and best friend, she entered the Center for Balanced Living to take her place on the successfully funded pilot of the NEW FED TR programme. And despite all her fears, a giant grin lit up her face.

It looks like any other kitchen. Long, grey countertops line one wall and an island; there’s a large stove, a sink and a fridge. Beau Barley, a tall, thin 20-year-old with bleached blond hair and a two-day-old beard, is cooking an omelette for breakfast while his parents prepare their own meals. It could be breakfast at any home in America, except that Beau is at the Center for Balanced Living, on his second day of the NEW FED TR programme.

“Okay, clients, check in with your supports to make sure you’ve got enough to eat,” calls the programme’s dietitian, Sonja Stotz. She listens in as Beau shows his meal of eggs, toast, butter, milk and fruit to his parents.

Like around half of those with anorexia, Beau suffered from obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) as a child, having to turn off lights in a certain way and avoid all the cracks on the sidewalk. Every time he heard a siren, he had to call his mom because he thought she had been in an accident because he didn’t do one of his rituals right.

Always sporty, his anorexia started with a simple desire to be a better runner on his high school cross-country team. He amped up his mileage, running longer and longer each day and eventually training year-round. The sport he loved became a compulsion. But overtraining eventually took a toll and he was sidelined by a severe stress fracture. His only thought as his leg was being X-rayed in the hospital was that he needed to cut back on his food if he wanted to stay in shape for next season. As his mother pushed him out of the emergency room in a wheelchair, she asked him what he wanted for dinner. “A salad,” he replied.

From there, Beau became more and more obsessed with eating ‘healthy’ and returning to running. At first, his weight was stable. But as his running obsession returned, his metabolism kicked in. Always somewhat slender, his weight plummeted. In the summer before he started university, he went through his first formal treatment programme at the Center for Balanced Living, attending group therapy during the day, eating his meals at the centre and returning home every night. Things started to look up, but Beau relapsed during his first year at university. Over the past summer and fall, he has tried to make progress against his eating disorder, but the exercise compulsion is cemented in place. When his mother called the centre to see if he could return, they recommended NEW FED TR. Beau eagerly signed up and now here he is, showing his parents what he has cooked for himself this morning.

“Are those all your exchanges?” his mother asks. NEW FED TR uses a meal plan that assigns each individual a certain number of choices or ‘exchanges’ from each food group for every meal and snack.

He indicates that it is, telling her how the food on his plate adds up to his prescribed meal. Satisfied with his choices, Stotz moves on to assist one of the three other families in the kitchen. Beau’s family sit down at the table and, as breakfast begins, Hill and Stotz suggest fun games to play as a distraction, to decrease the anxiety all of the clients feel around eating. The less anxiety they feel, the more likely they are to successfully complete the meal, which serves as their medication.
Stotz points out that her job is selling her patients on the idea that they need to eat more and exercise less, the very opposite of what most dietitians do. “I should go into sales,” she laughs.

In the morning sessions, Hill gives the clients and their families a crash course on eating disorder neurobiology. Eating disorders typically begin in adolescence, and anorexia is no different. Although the exact circumstances that trigger the onset of anorexia aren’t clear, nearly all cases begin when a person fails to meet their energy needs, placing them in a state of what researchers call negative energy balance – burning more calories than they eat. For some, a weight-loss diet precipitates the eating disorder; for others, it’s increased sports training, a growth spurt, an illness, decreased appetite from stress, even new braces.

For most people, being in a negative energy balance is profoundly uncomfortable. That’s why dieting often makes people impulsive and cranky, ‘hangry’ even. But those with a predisposition for anorexia have a completely different experience. Starvation makes them feel better.

[[{"fid":"3503","view_mode":"image_portrait_right_align","fields":{"format":"image_portrait_right_align"},"type":"media","link_text":null,"attributes":{"alt":"Anorexia OCD Magnus Voll Mathiassen","height":350,"width":350,"class":"media-element file-image-portrait-right-align"}}]]

Kaye’s work with women who have recovered from anorexia nervosa found unusually high levels of the neurotransmitter serotonin in the cerebrospinal fluid that bathes the brain, and he believes these levels were likely also present before the onset of anorexia. Although low serotonin levels are linked to depression, high serotonin levels aren’t good either, as they create a state of chronic anxiety and irritability. As many as three-quarters of those with anorexia had suffered from an anxiety disorder before their eating disorder began, most commonly social anxiety and OCD. It is this anxiety that Kaye believes makes some people much more vulnerable to anorexia.

The body synthesises serotonin from the amino acid tryptophan, which we get from our diet. Eat less food and you get less tryptophan and hence less serotonin. For people predisposed to anorexia, therefore, starvation reduces the anxiety and irritability associated with their high serotonin levels. Mission accomplished, or so it seems. The problem is that the brain fights back, increasing the number of receptors for serotonin to wring every last drop out of the neurotransmitter that is there. This increased sensitivity means that the old negative feelings return, which drives the person to cut back even more on what they’re eating. Any attempts to return to normal eating patterns wind up flooding the hypersensitive brain with a surge of serotonin, creating panic, rage and emotional instability. Anorexia has, in effect, locked itself into place.

Heather Purdin and her team see this first-hand as Hill asks the different groups of clients and supports to use yarn, taken from Hill’s massive collection of weaving supplies, to wind the client’s hands into place. Heather’s team rapidly pin her hands and arms in front of her face. This, Hill says, is the anorexia in action. Heather is now as stuck physically as she is mentally. Getting her functioning again means weaving her supports into her mental ‘loom’. Here is where the team struggle, especially when Hill asks Heather what she is going to do differently. In sheer frustration, she slams her knotted hands onto the table in front of her
.
“It’s not working,” she wails. “I can’t change.”

The tears start and it doesn’t seem they will ever stop. It is, however, her lightbulb moment.
“I realised I wasn’t completely crazy,” Heather says later. “It was a huge relief. It is real and I’m not making it up and I’m not a complete loser.”

Recovering from anorexia, Hill says, is like learning to navigate around landmines. They can be deadly, and they can derail recovery. One of the biggest struggles for people with anorexia is making decisions: a first-year university student on the programme, who asked not to be named, admits that she can stand in front of the fridge for hours trying to decide what to have for lunch. Frustrated, she often shuts the door without eating anything.

Hill rounds everyone up and asks them to toss their treatment binders into the centre of the room. One by one, the clients are asked to close their eyes and walk across the room without bumping into anything. Not surprisingly, no one can do it. But when they ask a family member to guide them, they get safely to the other side. In real life, this could mean the university student asking one of her parents to pack her lunch for her if she becomes too anxious to make a healthy decision.

“People with eating disorders have many amazing qualities, and like anything it has both positives and negatives,” says Hill. The goal of the programme is to make these traits work for an individual as much as possible, and to enlist loved ones to fill in for the parts of the brain that might not be working properly.

The exact details of this are hammered out by each family throughout the week in the Recovery Support Agreement. Skipping meals or snacks or not gaining weight as appropriate could result in consequences that are agreed in advance, like leaving university or eating more meals with supports.
“It’s helpful for people with anorexia because they like rules, they like structure, they don’t like the unknown, so they have a pretty good idea of what’s going to happen if they’re not able to eat and gain weight. And our data is suggesting that may be a useful approach,” says Kaye.

A 2003 study identified five personality traits that increased the risk of developing an eating disorder: perfectionism, inflexibility, having to follow the rules, excessive doubt and caution, and a drive for order and symmetry. Other studies have found links between anxiety, perfectionism and anorexia. Adults with anorexia get stuck on details and have trouble zooming out to see the big picture, which can make it difficult to make decisions. As well, they have difficulty mentally switching from one task to the next.

For too long, says Hill, eating disorder professionals have been focusing on these traits as weaknesses when that’s not true. To succeed at scientific research, for instance, obsessionality and attention to detail is almost a must. Since people with anorexia use rules and routines to ‘succeed’ at their eating disorder, they can also learn to use them to succeed at recovery. It sounds like a small shift, but for anorexia sufferers like Heather and Beau, it makes all the difference in the world.

“Make your quirks work,” Heather quips with a smile.

[[{"fid":"3501","view_mode":"image_landscape","fields":{"format":"image_landscape"},"type":"media","link_text":null,"attributes":{"alt":"family observe Hands Magnus Voll Mathiassen","height":662,"width":999,"class":"media-element file-image-landscape"}}]]

“Ew, don’t eat that,” says the mother of the first-year university student. She isn’t providing feedback at mealtime now but playing the role of the insula, a region of the brain that is sensitive to disgust. Other participants role-play other regions in a re-enactment of how the brain makes decisions around food.

In healthy individuals, determining what and how much to eat is controlled by a variety of factors, including what’s available, how much it’s liked and how hungry the person is. Not so in anorexia. Kaye’s work using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of the brain has teased out other important details. Unlike most people, whose brains respond strongly to rewarding things such as sweets, people with anorexia are generally far more sensitive to punishment (the removal of something pleasant) than reward.

Another study found that the brains of women who had recovered from anorexia responded significantly less to sugar water than healthy controls, and they found sweets less rewarding when hungry. Kaye says these results may indicate how they are able to continue starving even while food is plentiful, since people with anorexia find food less rewarding and thus have less motivation to eat. Tests also showed a preoccupation with future harm at the expense of what might be needed in the present moment.

“One reason that people with anorexia are able to starve themselves is that when they get hungry, the parts of the brain that should be driving reward and motivation just aren’t getting activated,” he says.
So when it’s time to role-play the ‘anorexia brain’ considering whether or not to take a bite of banana, those people playing brain regions responsible for reward (the feeling of ‘yum!’ when you eat a piece of chocolate cake) are quiet, while the brain areas responsible for worry kick into overdrive. The result is that no one in the room can hear the small, quiet part of the brain telling the person with anorexia it is okay to eat the banana.

Hill plays an audio recording of one of her former patients re-enacting the anorexic thoughts that tormented her while she ate – it is an endless stream of “I can’t eat this. I’m going to get fat. I’m ugly. I’m disgusting. I’m weak. I hate myself. I can’t do this. I’m so pathetic, just pathetic, a weak pig.” It goes on for more than ten minutes.

Parents, many of whom had walked into the programme frustrated and angry at their child’s seeming refusal to eat, hear the recording and the sheer amount of ‘noise’ that their children endure and their anger dissipates.

“I get it now,” Beau’s mom says, dabbing at her eyes with a tissue. “I get it.”

Heather’s week at the NEW FED TR programme has been life-altering: “For the first time, someone got what I had been saying all along, that I had a biologically based brain disorder,” she says. “They worked with me instead of against me.”

By December 2015, nearly 25 families had participated in NEW FED TR, and more pilot groups are in the works. Feedback, Hill says, has been uniformly positive, even from those with anorexia – pretty rare for a treatment programme that requires a person to face their deepest fears six times a day, eating three meals and three snacks. It’s too soon to say whether the programme has been effective in helping adult anorexia sufferers move towards recovery, but for Heather it marks the first time she has actually believed in her own ability to get better.

For the first time in 20 years, she says simply, “I have hope.” And with that, she heads to Trader Joe’s to buy ingredients for a Christmas feast she is hosting for friends and family. It would have been unimaginable last year, but now she hopes it will become a tradition that will continue for a very long time.

This article first appeared on Mosaic and is republished here under a Creative Commons licence.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Part 2 - UCSD 3rd Annual Eating Disorders Conference - Integrated Treatment of Substance Abuse and Eating Disorders 2016

[Part 1 of this 2-part series provided an overview and introduction.  My original goal in Part 2 was to cover highlights of the presentations.   However, Dr. Baker-Dennis gave me permission to include all the material she presented. I have italicized direct quotes from slides or items from my voluminous notes that may have been direct quotes.  I am selecting from a lot of information and hope that my account will be acceptable to the presenters as well as the conference organizers.  I've needed to set this aside for awhile as my loved one is again hospitalized and her team is working on a solution for next steps. (4/11).

I purposefully arrived Wednesday evening in order to attend Dr. Marc Schuckit's Thursday morning Substance Abuse 101 - a preconference "booster" designed for those of the eating disorder community.  Concurrently, Jessie Menzel, PhD, presented Eating Disorders 101.   The UCSD website provides a link to its three-video series on Eating Disorders 101.  You can access it by clicking here.  By the close of Dr. Schuckit's discussion two hours later, I felt I had a better handle on the topic and could therefore better understand the need for integrated treatment. I also had a better understanding of what my loved one was up against in terms of possibility of recovery.

After outlining what the lecture would cover:  drug groups and problems; substance use disorders (criteria, course, causes); and then Treatment (identification/intervention, detoxification [if available], and rehabilitation), Dr. Schuckit provided us with an overview of the four main classes of substances most often used - depressants, stimulants, opioids, and cannabinols.  He briefly touched on hallucinogens, PCP, solvents and others.  He addressed the substances' effects on neurotransmitters; the outward symptoms such as psychosis, depression, and anxiety; and the subjects of overdose and withdrawal.  As with eating disorders, genes and the environment are significant factors -  genetics 60% and environment 40%. He identified Motivational Interviewing as one key to helping the person get into recovery (a terrific segue to the afternoon talk on MI by Ken Resnicow) as well as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Dialectical Behavioral Therapy, self-help groups and some medications (not all have detox agents at this time).

Following lunch, the formal conference got underway with Stopping Whack-a-Mole: The Need for Integrated Treatment of Substance Abuse and Eating Disorders presented by Amy Baker-Dennis, PhD, FAED.   Her most recent book is Eating Disorders, Addictions and Substance Use Disorders: Research, Clinical and Treatment Perspectives, published in 2014, and more information can be found here.  In retrospect, I am realizing that Dr. Dennis's presentation was significant to the entire conference because it was so detailed and so comprehensive with elements that were addressed by each speaker in subsequent presentations.  Her argument is quite persuasive and very important.  I hope she is invited to give this presentation to many other conferences and groups.

Dr. Amy Baker Dennis kindly said she would welcome the publication here of the materials   that she presented during the conference. I have italicized direct quotes.  I am very grateful and I expect readers here will be, as well.  Integrated as well as individualized care is extremely important for those dealing with co-morbidities and substance abuse.  

Dr. Dennis brought the two morning topics together by first providing us with a sobering number of statistics about the occurrence of both disorders and the disruption in people's lives brought about by these two disorders.  

She described the shared characteristics:


  • life threatening disorders
  • increased risk for suicide
  • long term illnesses
  • resistant to treatment
  • frequent relapses
  • The 3 C's - compulsive craving, loss of control, continued use despite negative consequences
  • cognitive impairment
  • negative impact on all organ systems in the body
  • heritability
  • loss of self-esteem
  • high incidence of Borderline Personality Disorder
  • high rates of mood/anxiety disorders
  • developmental transitions (puberty, leaving home, marriage, parenthood)
  • trauma - child sexual or physical abuse, neglect incest, rape, witnessing violence
  • loss/separation
  • denial, secrecy and shame
  • interferes with interpersonal relationships
  • use of substance for mood altering effects
With similar adaptive functions of

  • to escape, avoid, and/or numb
  • to manage other co-morbid disorders (mood, anxiety, PTSD)
  • to punish the negative self


The differences, again examples from her list, include 


  • tolerance, physical dependence and withdrawal are not applicable to ED
  • lack of human research evidence on "toxis" or "allergic" trigger food substances
  • 3 C's of ED are the result of dieting and starvation, not food
  • mental illness versus medical disease
  • chronic vs curable conceptualization
  • conflicting research on genetic and familial etiology
  • difference drugs abused
The different treatment focus would be

  • increase restraint vs moderating over-control
  • abstinence versus normalization of eating behaviors
  • attitudes toward psychotherapy, medication and self-help
or re the last point, my remark that FOOD IS LIFE.  [I have hiked in the Grand Canyon many times.  One of the signs posted is "water is life."  So is food.]


Many of us parents have found few if any integrated treatment facilities.  Most provide sequential - meaning focus on the most acute disorder first and then move on to another provider to address the other, or parallel treatment during which treatment occurs at the same time but not at the same location and not provided by the same facility.  My loved one has experienced the latter several times without success.  I have also observed that the focus has shifted back and forth over the years from one disorder being "primary" to the other.

Dr. Dennis surveyed 351 publicly funded substance abuse facilities to learn if they provide eating disorder treatment.  [italics indicate direct quotes from her talk.]  Half of them screened for eating disorders upon intake, 29% admitted with ED, and 48 percent admitted eating disorder patients with low severity.  However, and as I have found here locally, in programs that did admit eating disorder patients, the primary treatment was the medical psychiatric model of addiction as opposed to standard EBT for eating disorders.

She obtained data on the availability of eating disorder treatment in privately funded SUD programs, as well.

  • 345 privately funded addiction treatment programs
  • 74% screened for ED
  • 67% admitted cases of low severity
  • only 21% attempted to actually treat the ED
  • 5% identified having some ED protocol (i.e. meal-planning supervised meals, bathroom monitoring, weighing and self-monitoring)
  • 3% provided dietary and/or nutritional services
  • 2% incorporated medical monitoring of the ED


[As a parent, I am dismayed by an apparent continuing entrenched attitude that eating disorders can be treated like an addiction.  The information provided at the conference was a breath of fresh air!!!]

Dr. Dennis also surveyed 20 nationally known, long-standing ED inpatient, residential and PHP/IOP treatment programs in the United States to learn of the availability of substance abuse treatment..  She learned that 55% (11 programs) provided integrated screening assessment and treatment of ED and SUD onsite, 4 programs provided sequential treatment onsite,  1 program provided sequential treatment off-site, and 4 programs provided parallel treatment.  Of the integrated programs, only 3 employed SUD/Addiction specialists on their staff.

Incidentally, in an article that appeared in the Science Section of the New York Times on Wednesday, March 15, there are now 75 privately funded eating disorder programs. However, there was no mention of substance abuse programs within the article.

Her first takeaway message to those attending is most publicly and privately funded substance abuse treatment facilities neither treat nor provide multidisciplinary evidence based treatment for patients with eating disorders, the availability of fully integrated treatment for ED patients with SUD is lacking in ED inpatient, residential and PHP/IOP programs, and many ED programs do not admit patients with active SUD.


I was primed to move on to Dr. Dennis's definition of integrated treatment, which includes: comprehensive and integrated screening, individualized comprehensive treatment plans, individual therapist and treatment team are highly trained in evidence based treatments for both disorders, services provided at the same locations by same providers in a step-wise, integrated fashion and plan for patient movement through different levels of care.


We learned why we need integrated treatment (with examples listed for each subtopic) - high rates of comorbidity, high mortality rates, complex symptom constellation, lack of services leave patients vacillating between ED and SUD.


So, knowing that my loved one has been diagnosed with a long-standing constellation of symptoms, I knew the reasons there needed to be integrated treatment but I learned the basis behind what I thought were the reasons. Very sobering, indeed.  In fact, I distinctly had the urge to go home at the end of the first day because I found it difficult to come face to face, again, with the reality that hope might not be in the picture for my loved one.  However, by the end of the second day, I was glad to have stayed because, again, my purpose in going was not only for my loved one but also for the readers of my blog who have an adult in their family with an ED (close now to 29,000 hits and counting).  And, I walked away with renewed hope.  

So, under high rates of comorbidity, approximately 50% of ED patients abuse substances, which is 5 times the rate seen in the general population.

  • alcohol
  • illicit drugs
  • prescription medications
  • over-the-counter medications
  • internet supplements


Under high mortality rates

  • meta-analysis of 249 reports of mortality in individuals with mental illness found that individuals with AN and BN had rates of suicide that were higher than any other psychiatric disorder and 23 times higher than seen in the general population
  • individuals with AN/BP have the highest risk of death of all ED patients
  • women with AUD are 20 times more likely to commit suicide than the general population
  • individuals with AN are 19 times more likely than the general population to have died from an SUD, primarily AUD.

Under complex symptom constellation, besides individuation of treatment plan for a person with  ED and/or SUD or both

  • a majority of these co-morbid patients are bulimic or binge eat
  • often have many psychiatric co-morbidities including MDD, anxiety disorders, PTSD, personality disorders (Multi-impulsive symptoms)
  • history of interpersonal trauma
  • poorer social, interpersonal and occupational functioning
  • may respond differently to interventions typically delivered in SUD programs and will need comprehensive, integrated ED/SUD services.


And, finally, under lack of services leave patients vacillating between ED and SUD, the title whack-a-mole is a very descriptive example as is symptom substitution, programs that do not admit dually diagnosed patients may see the emergence of other disorders with remission in the disorder they treatlack of available integrated treatment is a problem for primary care physicians, and ED and SUD specialists from multiple disciplines that need to provide appropriate referrals and, of course, families and sufferers are often confused about where to go for integrated services. 


So, why isn't integrated treatment common now?  What are the barriers?  I list below all those barriers provided:


Lack of evidence based treatment for ED/SUD
Lack of cross-training
Differences in treatment philosophy
Different staffing patters
Gaps between research and practice
Lack of accessibility to treatment
Lack of formal connections between ED and SUD communities

This list speaks volumes - one of those a picture (the slide) is worth a 1000 words.


Dr. Baker Dennis moved on to the Guidelines and Principles for Effective Integrated Treatment, reiterating several of the points earlier in the lecture.

Guidelines for Integrated Program Development include:

1.  Eating Disorders and substance use disorders are treated concurrently
2.  Treatment team needs to be fully trained in evidence based practices for both ED and SUD
3.  Formal and informal cross training between disciplines and clinical specialties is essential
4.  Motivational interventions are used to assist patients at all stages of treatment
5.  Cognitive Behavioral therapy is the cornerstone of treatment for ED and SUD during active treatment and relapse prevention
6.  Multiple modalities for services are available including individual, group, family, nutritional and self-help

Principles for Effective Integrated Treatment

1.  ED and SUD are complex but treatable conditions that affect brain functioning and behavior
2.  No single treatment is appropriate for all individuals
3.  Treatment needs to be readily available
4.  Effective treatment attends to multiple needs of the individual not just the ED and the SUD
5.  Understanding the "adaptive function" of the ED and SUD can inform case formulation
6.  Remaining in treatment for an adequate period of time is critical for treatment effectiveness
7.  Counseling (individual, family, group and nutritional) and other behavioral therapies are critical components of effective treatment
8.  Medications are an important element of treatment
9.  The treatment plan must be continually assessed and modified to meet the person's changing needs
10. Medical detoxification is only the first stage of addiction treatment and by itself, does little to change long-term drug use
11. Weight restoration, the normalization of eating patters and the elimination of compensatory behaviors is only the first stage of recovery from an ED
12. Treatment does not need to be voluntary to be effective
13. ED related behaviors and drug use during treatment must be continuaously monitored
14. Patients should be tested for the presence of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis B and C, tuberculosis and other infectious disease and targeted risk reduction counseling should be provided

In closing, Dr. Dennis provide the benefits of integrated treatment


  • Improves treatment delivery
  • Improved continuity of care
  • Reduces time in treatment
  • Lowers overall treatment costs
  • Improves treatment outcome
  • Lessens professional treatment referral confusion
  • Lessens consumer confusion


While listening to this presentation, I also reflected on the value of dialectical behavioral therapy in addition to Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (point 5 of Guidelines) for DBT has been shown to be especially effective for many who have anorexia/bulimia combined with the diagnosis of Borderline Personality Disorder.  The presentation by Dr. Seth Axelrod, PhD of Yale University School of Medicine, Yale-New Haven Psychiatric Hospital goes into great depth on the use of DBT for both ED and SUD.  I will be addressing this in the next part.

Under point 5 of Principles, the example given of adaptive function would be the discovery by the patient that a certain behavior, once it is an entrenched pattern e.g. bulimia or not eating, is sufficiently disruptive to the existing family dynamics to encourage partnership between two parents who might otherwise seek a divorce.

Under point 6, in several places on my blog and and during presentations to Congressional Legislators and/or their key staff during the Mom's March in Washington, DC this past fall, I reiterated the comment that treatment must be for as long as needed.  Too often insurance companies revisit the case every ten days or if the person is lucky 30 days but neither is sufficient for the rewiring of the pathways of each individual's brain.  For eating disorders, the minimum in my opinion is 6 months with follow-up therapy possibly lasting years.

Under point 12, here in Arizona because all private treatment facilities require that the patient is willing (and who among us with children, adult or not, have been faced with resistance to the extreme at least for the first 2-3 months of treatment whether at home or in a treatment program - the term "non-compliant" sends my blood pressure soaring), the choices where one can find involuntary treatment are three:  the Arizona State Hospital, jail, or prison.  An exception might be if a judge specifically orders treatment with the consequence of not attending, again - jail.

So, wrapping up Dr. Dennis's presentation, I encourage parents and loved ones of someone fighting both an eating disorder and substance abuse to investigate whether or not the facility to which they might send their loved one follows the Guidelines and Principles listed above.  And, may those who attended the conference carry back with them these principles and guidelines to put in practice at facilities that could then better serve the people who come to those facilities for help.




Wednesday, March 2, 2016

UC San Diego 3rd Annual Eating Disorders Conference: Integrated Treatment of Substance Abuse and Eating Disorders February 25-26, 2016, Part 1 Introduction

(I will post additional remarks/summaries about the content of the conference in Part 2 which will take me more time to put together.  As I review my notes and the materials presented and discuss some of the issues with a local therapist and psychiatrist,  I am gaining additional insights and understanding.)

I decided to attend this amazing conference for two reasons:  to learn more about the subject of the title of this post and to learn if there might be any possibility of effective treatment for my loved one whose life has been chaotic for more than 27 years years due to multiple co-morbidities plus severe and enduring anorexia nervosa/bulimia subtype and the search to find something to address the chaos.

My questions to the reader are, "What would you do to help reduce absolute chaos in your loved one's life if nothing was working?"  And, if your loved one with an ED and co-morbidities such as bipolar disorder, depression, borderline personality disorder and/or anxiety disorder (or all of these) could not find a solution to his/her chaotic life, what might s/he do about it?  Did you know that up to 50 percent choose substance abuse as a solution?  How do we address and design treatment for someone struggling with these issues?

Here's the program for the two days:

I attended (I've abbreviated a few of the titles) Substance Abuse 101; Stopping Whack-a-Mole; Motivational Interviewing; From Science to Practice; the Psychopharmacology of Emotion Dysregulation in Eating-Disordered Patients with Co-Occurring Disorders; Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT) for Integrated Treatment of Substance Abuse and Eating Disorders; Partners and Parents; and the Developing Brain:  Insights from Neuroimaging.

From the point of view of a parent who has pretty much read and digested everything I could get my hands on or listen to re eating disorders, co-morbidities and substance abuse for the past 27 years including Laura Collins' book, Eating with Your Anorexic, which was a revelation to me,  I could not have asked for a more comprehensive and informative curriculum that would address my loved one's needs and provide me with additional knowledge to pursue effective care.  I applaud the conference organizers and sincerely thank, as well,  Gina Bongiorno, MFT, and Erin Parks PhD for the extra time they provided to me to answer many questions.  I continue to consider Dr. Walter Kaye one of my heroes.  I thank very much Jennifer "J.D." Ouellette for her support, company and reassurance during the time I was there.

[The backdrop was the Hilton La Jolla Torrey Pines Resort located south of and a few minutes walk from the Torrey Pines State Reserve where there are several hiking trails, a few offering splendid views of the surf and the Pacific Ocean.  Those of us lodging there were offered a very reasonable rate.  I arrived Wednesday evening and left early Saturday morning, enjoying two delicious dinners and breakfasts apart from the meals provided during the conference.  Their Starbucks on site provided me with my hot soy chai thanks to two coupons offered to me upon my arrival as well as two appetizer coupons for dinner.  Indulge me while I provide a few photos including one of the trail map.  Then it's back to the conference!]

Here's a view from my room, four from a trail within the Torrey Pines State Reserve, and a photo of the map provided to me by the concierge who made sure to tell me that I needed to be out of the park by sunset when it closes:









So.......

Dr. Kaye outlined the goal of the conference in his welcome letter to us:

"Our goal for this year's [the third] conference was to bring together eating disorder clinicians and substance use clinicians so that we can learn together, and from each other, how to help those struggling with co-occurring disorders.  One third of people struggling with substances abuse report eating pathology, and up to half of all adults diagnosed with eating disorders meet criteria for substance abuse.  [emphasis mine.] Cross-training and collaboration across these two specialty areas will help us to better serve these individuals - thank you for being here to help serve this goal."

I was one of the few parents but I did not feel out of place I think mostly because none of the language used or the methods discussed was unfamiliar to me.  I certainly gained a much better understanding of Motivational Interviewing thanks to Ken Resnicow, PhD, and of Dialectical Behavioral Therapy thanks to Seth Axelrod, PhD.  In fact, if I had been restricted to just a few of the offerings, I would have selected those two plus the Psychopharmacology of Emotion Dysregulation in Eating Disodered Patients with Co-Occurring Disorders presented by Terry Schwartz, MD and Mary Ellen Trunko, MD and that by Amy Baker-Dennis (see next paragraph).  Fortunately, however, all sessions were open to me and all were highly informative.

Prior to her presentation, I spoke briefly with Amy Baker-Dennis, PhD, FAED, who provided those attending the 2010 NEDA Conference in New York City  a similar but much earlier version of her presentation about The Need for Integrated Treatment of Substance Abuse and Eating Disorders.  So much more information this time gained from her years of additional experience and practice!

Because some readers here may know more about substance abuse than eating disorders and since I did not attend Eating Disorders 101, here's a link to three videos found on the UCSD Medical School Center for Eating Disorder website titled, Eating Disorders 101.  (As I post this, I am wondering out loud if the 2016 conference was videotaped and might be available for a modest price?  I will find out.)  I will repost this paragraph in the next post, as well.