Thanks to poster Charlotte on the F.E.A.S.T. site for highlighting this Stanford University Researcher's thoughts about the gastrointestinal system, the presence of serotonin and dopamine (for example) in the gut, and the possible linkages to hormone changes, among other facts. Jam-packed video. Harriet Brown examined some of this information in a 2005 NY Times article and I postulated about what serotonin in the gut might do in an earlier post but this is all a leap beyond what I learned a year ago from Martha Fankhauser.
Thanks to the wonderful world wide web, I also found this amazing website that focuses on autoimmunity lists studies having to do with serotonin. Striving Chef's posts house a wealth of information. What a great resource!
This research is very promising, for sure!
Information is provided about eating disorders, particularly of adults, to parents and other loved ones written by a parent who is in recovery from an eating disorder.
Welcome
When I created this blog, I was "getting on" in my early sixties, hence the blog name. However, my adult daughter's eating disorder and co-occurring emotional dysregulation disorder and other co-morbidities - ongoing for about 33 years - became and was our focus as we attempted to help her get into recovery. By learning about, reflecting on, reading about, attending conferences and writing about eating and brain disorders, I created a place to blog what I've learned. I hope this blog will be of use to others, especially families of and adult sufferers themselves to help them get into recovery. I update posts from time and the update date will be present at the top of the post.
Sadly, my daughter passed away in early October 2021 mainly because her body became so malnourished that she was immunocompromised, contracted a severe infection that was not properly addressed during an earlier hospital stay the month before, and developed an overwhelming non-covid pneumonia following surgery to save her life. I believe she should have been able to receive palliative care but Arizona, our country, and even the professionals trained in the treatment of eating disorders, particularly anorexia, are not "there" yet. I address the issue of palliative care in a recent post below, initially written in November 2021. I am not a certified eating disorder specialist. I am an Expert by Experience and college-educated with a BA in Community Work with an additional certificate in a one-year program in Business Administration from the same institution.
I am passionate about all of this because, as Shakespeare wrote in The Taming of the Shrew, Act 4, Scene 3: "My tongue will tell the anger [and sadness] of my heart or else my heart, concealing it, will break. And, rather than it shall, I will be free even to the uttermost, as I please in words."[2016]
Travel Guide
If you're new to my blog, I recommend you begin on the right side and take a look at the "Of Note" offerings. Read Dr. Cynthia Bulik's recent published interview (5/4/22) "Rethinking Eating Disorders" if you want to print an easy-to-understand professional's expert opinion about anorexia for your family doctor or the therapist. [Early intervention is absolutely critical. For those whose eating disorder is categorized as entrenched or severe and enduring, read the editorial comment by Stephen Touyz and Philipa Hay for a new approach about treatment. It is possible for your loved one to recover! I have also attached a link here for additional papers on the subject of severe and entrenched eating disorders. If you are a family member or friend of an adult with an eating disorder and have been at this for awhile, I refer you to the posts within the title "Adult Eating Disorders and Recovery Tools" found in the Index on the right hand side of this site. As well, in the "Of Note" section take a look at those posts with an asterisk. If you're a parent and need support, look for posts in the Index about parent support or parent toolbox.
In my opinion, the best book to buy, to refer to constantly and to share with members of the medical/psychiatric profession is "Sick Enough: A Guide to the Medical Complications of Eating Disorders" by Jennifer L. Gaudiani MD, CEDS, FAED. "Dr. Gaudiani aims to improve medical diagnosis and treatment, motivate recovery, and validate the lived experiences of individuals of all body shapes and sizes, while firmly rejecting dieting culture."
I recommend two groups who will support you on your journey - F.E.A.S.T and the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Both maintain websites and Facebook private groups.
Tuesday, December 27, 2011
Monday, December 26, 2011
Too much dopamine? not enough oxytocin? SSRI's? Autism Spectrum?
In earlier posts, after a detailed discussion with Martha Fankhauser, a pharmacologist whose interest extends to working with local behavioral health providers, I wrote about the balance of SSRI's and dopamine, and mentioned the problems that occur when dopamine is in excess. A simple explanation along with symptoms can be found at this site, too. I also thought out loud about the significance of oxytocin.
These neurotransmitters and this hormone are on my mind again today because I just read a fascinating article in today's New York Times (December 26, 2011) titled "Navigating Love and Autism" in which the young man mentioned, who has been diagnosed with a form of autism (others describe the symptoms as being along the autism spectrum) known as Asperger syndrome, is also thinking about these things.
The article is an insightful piece, looking at the problems that people -- children, young adults, and adults -- must deal with. The article is also illuminating for those who do not understand the syndrome or haven't needed to not only because it reviews articulately the behaviors that many find rude or hard to understand but also opens doors of possibility for those reading it to recognize behaviors of a family member or client (as in the case of a psychologist or psychiatrist).
I am among many who believe that many of the behaviors we see connected with the autism syndrome, eating disorders, "personality disorders" such as borderline personality disorder (which research is showing is also a disorder of the brain rather than of the personality) and other brain disorders such as schizophrenia are all linked in the sense that they rise from imbalances in neurochemicals or in the endocrine system. Until the cause is found that might be treated, the current approach is to treat with meds. Finding the right one, or multiples, and the balancing of those is critical. So is teaching those with these disorders to learn how to cope and therefore develop new and improved ways of interacting with and responding to their environment.
A significant interest of the young man written about -- Jack Robison -- is on the biochemical/neurological issues that are in the background of his syndrome and he has been investigating those. I hope he and others continue the investigation.
These neurotransmitters and this hormone are on my mind again today because I just read a fascinating article in today's New York Times (December 26, 2011) titled "Navigating Love and Autism" in which the young man mentioned, who has been diagnosed with a form of autism (others describe the symptoms as being along the autism spectrum) known as Asperger syndrome, is also thinking about these things.
The article is an insightful piece, looking at the problems that people -- children, young adults, and adults -- must deal with. The article is also illuminating for those who do not understand the syndrome or haven't needed to not only because it reviews articulately the behaviors that many find rude or hard to understand but also opens doors of possibility for those reading it to recognize behaviors of a family member or client (as in the case of a psychologist or psychiatrist).
I am among many who believe that many of the behaviors we see connected with the autism syndrome, eating disorders, "personality disorders" such as borderline personality disorder (which research is showing is also a disorder of the brain rather than of the personality) and other brain disorders such as schizophrenia are all linked in the sense that they rise from imbalances in neurochemicals or in the endocrine system. Until the cause is found that might be treated, the current approach is to treat with meds. Finding the right one, or multiples, and the balancing of those is critical. So is teaching those with these disorders to learn how to cope and therefore develop new and improved ways of interacting with and responding to their environment.
A significant interest of the young man written about -- Jack Robison -- is on the biochemical/neurological issues that are in the background of his syndrome and he has been investigating those. I hope he and others continue the investigation.
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Involving Your Local Schools - a CD-ROM of kits from NEDA
While visiting the Parents, Family and Friends Network of NEDA this morning, I was delighted to learn that NEDA will send a CD-ROM packet containing three updated as of November 1, 2011, information kits directed to (1) educators, (2) coaches, and athletic trainers, and (3) parents to schools in your area on your behalf. Click here for more information about the kits and scroll down to the link provided.
Parents, you can click on the same link, click on the kit for parents, and download a valuable printed reference notebook. I've put mine in a 3-ring binder.
Parents, you can click on the same link, click on the kit for parents, and download a valuable printed reference notebook. I've put mine in a 3-ring binder.
Guest Post by Dr. Julie O'Toole - Inpatient Eating Disorder Treatment Checklist for Parents
If your child or adolescent is admitted to a hospital for the medical complications of an eating disorder, you need to carefully assess adequacy of care at that hospital.
Common sense would dictate that we not become aggressive, belittling or demanding of professionals on whom our child is temporarily dependent for medical intervention, however you should not hesitate to inform yourself, rely on your intuition and experience and ask questions. The days of “because I said so and I am the doctor” are gone in medicine, or should be.There are basically two types of medical hospitalizations for eating disorder crises: 1. the emergent kind at the nearest hospital, regardless of that hospital’s specific eating disorder expertise and 2. the urgent kind in a hospital which you have sought out specifically because of their expertise in treating the complications of eating disorders.
In the first kind of hospitalization, you may need to be patient until imminent danger of death has passed and then arrange transfer elsewhere. An example of this might be an admission to an internist, pediatrician or hospitalist at a community hospital for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, severe inanition (wasting) or syncope (fainting). We had an adolescent patient referred to us once whom the police had found semi-conscious at the side of the road, grossly starved and cold. This extreme is what I mean by an emergent admission for inanition. If such an admission is needed and the hospital team does not have an AED handbook for medical care, provide them with one.
The second kind of admission (urgent, experienced or specialist hospital) is more usually done for a patient who may or may not be expected to die without such care, but who is in any case compromised medically and/or may reasonably be feared to be in danger of re-feeding syndrome if re-fed in another setting. Such patients might be expected to meet AAP admission guidelines for orthostasis, bradycardia, etc.
The following is a check list I am proposing for parents to use in evaluating the adequacy of their child’s hospital care:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent? Are you blamed for your child’s illness? Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited? If the answer to any of these questions is “yes”, move this hospital to the “unacceptable” pile and seek care elsewhere as soon as you can.
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care? This needs to be an attending physician or nurse practitioner. If it is a team of doctors who rotate, ask who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs.
- How often is phosphorus checked? This will need to be daily (or more often in the Intensive Care Unit, aka ICU) as long as calories are still being adjusted upward.
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight? Most hospitalizations are not long enough to achieve full weight restoration and ultimate goal weights usually only matter this early in the hospitalization in those cases where a need for weight restoration is ignored, for example where the doctor/team argues that the “patient’s BMI was too high to begin with” (!!). For most patients the issue addressed under Point 5 below is much more critical. I strongly recommend that weight goals not be shared with the pediatric patient either by the staff or by the parent.
- Although it is common for a patient to actually lose weight for the first 2-4 days of re-feeding due to fluid shifts, after that the weight curve should be steadily upward. Ask: who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily? Excellent weight gain should average 0.2 kg/day. If it is lower than that see Point 6 below.
- Calculating calories/food intake: the majority of patients hospitalized for an eating disorder will have lost weight relative to their own norm. This means they will enter the re-feeding process hypometabolic as the brain tries to conserve energy in a time of famine. Once you begin re-feeding, however, the metabolic fires will jump up and the patient will need many more calories than ever before. It is critical that calories/food are titrated to weight gain, so that if the rate of gain is much less than 0.2 kg/day more food will be added. Fat must never be allowed to be restricted. On this specific point your questions for your treatment team are: What is the start point for caloric intake (low is fine)? How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often? And—importantly—is phosphorus checked during this time? I strongly recommend that discussions of calories/exchanges/fat grams not be shared with the pediatric patient by the staff or by a parent.
- How are meals supervised? I can’t tell you how often kids report back to me that they were able to hide food or spit out medications because of a lack of adequate staff supervision.
- Aftercare should be discussed from the outset, after about 24 hrs of hospital care. Everyone is usually too upset for the first 24 hours to take in much information about aftercare planning, but in order to maintain the gains made in the hospital and prevent re-hospitalization, it will be important to hand-off the pediatric patient to an outpatient team whether that team is a “Maudsley” style team, a day treatment team or other. How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers (including the family of course!)?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging? Experienced teams will always have a plan for this. It matters.
- Are patients with very low heart rates or personal histories of fainting monitored on telemetry? We have had a handful of patients who experienced “asystole” or stopping of the heart, which caused them to “faint”. Had they not been on telemetry we might have just ascribed this to “dehydration”. On the cardiac monitor we were clearly able to see how, in some vulnerable patients, the heart can be acted on by a simple stimulus such as a blood draw, standing up from lying down, etc. with an episode of cardiac arrest.
So to recap the questions:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent?
- Are you blamed for your child’s illness?
- Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited?
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care?
- Who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs?
- How often is phosphorus checked?
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight?
- Who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily?
- What is the start point for caloric intake?
- How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often?
- Are calories increased to meet any loss of weight or stagnation in weight gain?
- Is phosphorus checked during this time (of caloric increase)?
- How are meals supervised?
- How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging?
- Do they keep their patients with bradycardia (low heart rate) on telemetry?
[Re-printed here with the permission of Dr. O'Toole who is the founder and medical director of the Kartini Clinic for Disordered Eating.]
The Parent, Family and Friends Network - Insurance Information article by Susan Maccia
The Parent, Family and Friends Network of the National Eating Disorders Association publishes a quarterly newsletter. One of the issues (fall 2011) includes several important articles (as usual) including a piece by outgoing PFN chair, Susan Maccia, on Single Case Agreements. The article identifies an SCA as:
If the services to meet an identified clinical need are not available within the contracted network, necessary services are provided in a timely manner through an out-of-network provider. A Single Case Agreement is a contractual agreement developed for an enrolled person (insured) based on that person's behavioral health needs and for a predetermined period of time.
Among the articles in this issue: a NEDA Conference recap (2011), Males and Eating Disorders, the NEDA Navigators, the existence of a NEDA Loss Support Network, an announcement of planned free webinars, and one about athletes and eating disorders.
To find out more about the PFN Network, click here
Friday, December 2, 2011
"Out of the Darkness"
"Out of the Darkness" is the title of an essay written by Mark Lukach that appeared in the New York Times on Sunday, November 27, 2011, in the Sunday Styles Modern Love Section, p. 6. The title caught my eye because it reminded me of the incredibly illuminating essay that was originally published in Vanity Fair and then became a book by William Styron - Darkness Visible - A Memoir of Madness (Random House, 1990) that I purchased almost twenty years ago when I wanted to understand more about depression and perhaps empathize more effectively with a loved one suffering from a severe depression at that time. The essay written by Mr. Lukach is accompanied by a sketch showing two people in a sad embrace with the image of a woman falling in the head of one of the two people.
I could stop here and encourage you to read it but I want to say a bit more about the article.
A husband walks through and supports fully his wife's journey through a terrible psychotic break and the story is rich with language that so well describes her and his experience.
Essays like these, I believe, are so helpful to the public unfamiliar with brain disorders. So many (and at one time I counted myself among them) do not understand mental illness. So many read and hear comments that stigmatize mental illness. The media publishes and displays the comments and views that stigmatize mental illness/brain disorders to the detriment of many who are seriously ill and need help but who are afraid to ask for it for fear of being labeled unemployable or worse yet, called "crazy" - a terribly derogatory word.
Will.....Willpower
[It's raining with some lightning here so rather than going for a hike this morning, I pulled out this article because the subject has intrigued me for a very long time. I have wondered what was behind my decision to quit my eating disorder - sick and tired of being sick and tired? change in mind-set? deeper understanding of my "self"? will power? And, if willpower, am I genetically blessed with the whatever it is to have a strong will?....]
The Sunday, November 27, 2011, New York Times published an article titled "Willpower: It's in Your Head" written by Greg Walton, an assistant professor of psychology at Stanford and Carol Dweck, professor of psychology, also at Stanford [colleagues of Dr. James Lock?] in which they conclude that attributing our failures of will to our biology -- to our "fixed biological limits" -- is wrong.
They state,
"In research that we conducted with the psychologist Veronika Job, we confirmed that willpower can indeed be quite limited -- but only if you believe it is. When people believe that willpower is fixed and limited, their willpower is easily depleted. But when people believe that willpower is self-renewing -- that when you work hard, you're energized to work more; that when you've resisted one temptation, you can better resist the next one -- then people successfully exert more willpower. It turns out that willpower is in your head."
[The mind/brain is an amazing thing, isn't it?]
The authors provide studies and the results to support this thesis. They emphasize that of course a person needs to eat and to rest/sleep but they do not, as posited by Roy F. Baumeister and John Tierney in their book Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, need to ingest straight glucose to keep that willpower going.
The authors of the New York Times article conclude by writing,
"At stake in this debate is not just a question about the nature of willpower. It's also a question of what kind of people we want to be. Do we want to be a people who dismiss our weaknesses as unchangeable? When a student struggles in math, should we tell that student, "Don't worry, you're just not a math person"? Do we want him [or her] to give up in the name of biology? Or do we want him to work harder in the spirit of what he wants to become."
Yes, this essay does not mention those who have disabilities and I do believe, no matter what they write, that some people have difficult with advanced mathematics (I do; my daughter doesn't at all). Neither does it touch on genetics. However, this essay and the book have me curious enough that I'll probably read the recently published book -- for I know that the brain does need 500 calories a day of glucose preferably (my opinion) available from complex carbohydrates and not straight sugar as the authors apparently suggested on NPR -- and I'm happy to see that researchers are continuing to take a look at this aspect of our behavior/decision making.
Thursday, December 1, 2011
Has the Tipping Point Been Reached? - Drs. Bulik and Ravin
This week two different internet news items caught my attention.
The first was a 56-minute presentation by Dr. Cynthia Bulik of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill at a Stockholm Psychiatry Lecture held at Karolinska Institutet, November 15, 2011. The title of her talk is The Complex Dance of Genes and Environment in Eating Disorders and can be found here, thanks to You Tube! Some of the slides she presents are graphic and can be triggering or very upsetting to those with either anorexia or bulimia. They were important, I believe, for the thrust of her talk. Dr. Bulik's lecture is hugely important not only for the scientific information she presents but also because she has taken a step further and looked at the potential for possibly preventing the occurrence of eating disorders in the offspring of those with either eating disorders or the family propensity for those illnesses. Those of us who attended the F.E.A.S.T. conference in early November in Alexandria, Virginia heard some of her points; this lecture is far more extensive.
I was also excited to hear her state there is a genetic consortium of scientists to further the study of anorexia nervosa known as GCAN. The website that is part of the Department of Psychiatry Eating Disorders Program at UNC Chapel Hill states,
Since 2007, the University of North Carolina Eating Disorders Program has led a world effort to unite clinicians and researchers around the world in an effort to identify genes that may influence risk for eating disorders. This has resulted in the Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa (GCAN) which currently consists of researchers and clinicians from 16 countries around the world. Together with researcher from Kings College London, the UNC program has been honored to receive a grant from the Wellcome Trust (WTCCC3) to conduct genomewide association on over 4000 DNA samples from individuals with anorexia nervosa. All members of the consortium are gathering information about eating disorders course and genetic material (DNA) from any individual who currently has or has had an eating disorder in the past. This world-wide effort is inviting every person with current or past anorexia nervosa to take the time to roll up their sleeves and help us figure out the cause of eating disorders.
We are currently gathering information and genetic material (DNA from a blood sample) from women who have had anorexia nervosa at any time in their life. Information from this study will advance our understanding of the causes of anorexia nervosa and further our ability to develop more effective treatments and prevention strategies.
If you are female and have had anorexia nervosa at any time in your life, you are invited to participate in this study. Participation only takes 30 minutes and includes a blood draw.
If you are female and have had anorexia nervosa at any time in your life, you are invited to participate in this study. Participation only takes 30 minutes and includes a blood draw.
Call Jessica Baker today at 919-966-1217 or her at jessica_baker@med.unc.edu if you are interested in donating your blood to help us unlock the genetic code of eating disorders.
Note that they are looking for participants for this study.
The word consortium is what especially caught my attention because this concept - consortium - is spreading throughout the scientific world to bring research results forward faster, to obtain grants and donations to expedite that research, and to collect meaningful data that is understandable across fields.
So is consensus science.
So is consensus science.
The second item was Dr. Sarah Ravin's recent post titled, "Active Ingredients" Dr. Ravin's post is extraordinary because she not only takes a firm, public stand on the approach to be taken when treating those with eating disorders, she also provides a flow chart for how one must treat a person with an eating disorder. This post is important for scientific researchers, psychiatrists, medical doctors, therapists, nutritionists and families. I would call it a "recommendation for best practices in the treatment of an eating disorder."
Her introduction is so very important -
To the patient’s detriment, many clinicians do not add the right ingredients at the right times in the right doses. For example, many individual therapy approaches focus initially on helping the patient develop insight and motivation to recover. Full nutrition is not required, or even encouraged, until the patient has lost a significant amount of weight.
Many clinicians are simply using the wrong recipe.
Dr. Ravin goes on to list the essentials at each step as well as the issues that can wait. The flow chart isn't for a month or even three months (the typical length of time paid for by insurance companies in this country, the latter figure of three months rather unusual). Her chart covers a period of 12-18 months (!) and in closing incorporates a list of must haves before a parent sends a young person off to college or to live independently.
Dr. Ravin highlights the importance of investigating the possibility of other factors such as brain disorders like anxiety, OCD, and depression and their treatment, something I've been pushing for for a long time in comments on Something Fishy and other websites because of my loved one's experience. Too often families and therapists think a person will be "well" once they are re-nourished and in some cases that is true or seems to be true. The symptoms seem to disappear. Yet, the propensity is still there. In many cases this myth of "only an eating disorder" must be dispelled on behalf of those who fall back into the abyss and cannot seem to climb out because these and other illnesses have not been diagnosed, have not been treated, and the individuals have not been provided with the tools (also mentioned in Dr. Ravin's chart) to quell their anxiety or to "regulate emotions and tolerate distress." This is where CBT (Cognitive Behavioral Therapy) and DBT (Dialectical Behavioral Therapy) and other modalities are introduced.
I was so thrilled to see and read Dr. Ravin's post as well as watch Dr. Bulik. I know we've reached the tipping point. Now with films like Someday Melissa and Miss Representation getting nationwide attention (the latter has already been screened here in Tucson by The Arizona List) and organizations like F.E.A.S.T., NEDA and its affiliates, and NAMI along with the attention of the National Institutes of Health's National Institute of Mental Health (thank you Dr. Insel!) we need to keep raising our voices and spreading the word.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)