During a recent hospitalization, the usual assessment was made of my loved one's progress. The report included the "multiaxial" system for assessment found in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. The latest version is the DSM-V - the current edition published in 2013. Interestingly, the multiaxial system was dropped from the DSM-V. Here is a link to the history and discussion about the DSM-V and the multiaxial system.
As part of this update to DSM-V, a new scale was developed called the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Here is a link to this scale. It's not clear to me that this new scale gets at what is on a person's mind although the questions do investigate a person's ability to function.
Since the multiaxial system is still in use here and probably elsewhere, I thought it a good idea to post about it. For those not in the profession or not familiar with the multiaxial system, this system was designed to provide what is considered by the psychiatric profession to be a comprehensive diagnosis or picture of the entire scope of factors that account, it is believed, for a patient's mental health.
Next, I list the categories I found on the report with a simple description of each of the five. Note that these are examples only:
Axis 1 - the clinical disorders and mental illnesses including, e.g., bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, severe depression, schizophrenia, substance abuse disorders, and eating disorders such as anorexia
Axis 2 - long standing personality and developmental disorders, e.g. what is known as borderline personality disorder
Axis 3 - general medical conditions, acute medical conditions and physical disorders e.g. osteoporosis, cardiac arrhythmias, acute weight loss
Axis 4 - psychosocial and environmental factors believed to be contributing to the patient's mental health, e.g. death of a loved one or family member, acute trauma, serious illness of family member
Axis 5 - the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) Scale
Perhaps because Axis 5 had never been included in previous reports provided to me or the Axis category had never included any information, I'd never known about Axis 5 or what is called the GAF Scale. The scale provides a hypothetical continuum of mental health-illness looking at psychological, social and occupational functioning, ranging from 100 (superior) to less than 10 (persistent danger of severely hurting self or others; inability to maintain minimal personal hygiene; or serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death). The assessment is usually made by at least one and hopefully two or more psychiatrists. Here in Arizona, what is known as the Title 36 process involves the independent assessment of a person by two psychiatrists.
Here is a link to a comprehensive GAF Scale.
A score of anything at 50-41 points to serious symptoms (e.g. suicidal ideation, severe obsessional rituals, frequent shoplifting) or any serious impairment in social occupational, or school functioning (e.g. no friends, unable to keep a job). As one descends to, say, 10 the person is in persistent danger of severely hurting self or commits a serious suicidal act with clear expectation of death. As one climbs the scale above 50, one encounters moderate to mild to minimal symptoms and tops out at superior functioning.
The number I found on the report represented, I was told, where my loved one stood and it shocked me. Shocked me because if her providers and insurers knew of this score, they knew she was more than seriously mentally ill. Suicidal ideation comes into the picture at 50. After learning about the scale and what the number meant, I felt I was armed with even more valid information to insist on hospitalization for an extended period of time. My family member just completed 7 weeks of inpatient hospitalization and has been moved, in spite of a continuing low number on the GAF Scale, to a step-down in spite of our and another professional's objections.
Yet, for the first time, we and the team were able to obtain inpatient hospital treatment until our loved one's weight reached a BMI of 19.4. The goal was higher than that but how grateful we were that the hospital staff worked hard to help see this achievement - a miracle and hopefully a precedent for others in the State of Arizona where a bill to to study the impact of required treatment for eating disorders for those with the low/no income insurance known as AHCCCS was snuffed out in committee.
I decided to write about this scale here because it seems to me that this scale and the score given to a loved one with multiple diagnoses might help a family obtain inpatient or residential treatment paid for by health insurance. At the very least, the score might help a family get their loved one into a safe place for more than a short period of time.
Information is provided about eating disorders, particularly of adults, to parents and other loved ones written by a parent who is in recovery from an eating disorder.
Welcome
When I created this blog, I was "getting on" in my early sixties, hence the blog name. However, my adult daughter's eating disorder and co-occurring emotional dysregulation disorder and other co-morbidities - ongoing for about 33 years - became and was our focus as we attempted to help her get into recovery. By learning about, reflecting on, reading about, attending conferences and writing about eating and brain disorders, I created a place to blog what I've learned. I hope this blog will be of use to others, especially families of and adult sufferers themselves to help them get into recovery. I update posts from time and the update date will be present at the top of the post.
Sadly, my daughter passed away in early October 2021 mainly because her body became so malnourished that she was immunocompromised, contracted a severe infection that was not properly addressed during an earlier hospital stay the month before, and developed an overwhelming non-covid pneumonia following surgery to save her life. I believe she should have been able to receive palliative care but Arizona, our country, and even the professionals trained in the treatment of eating disorders, particularly anorexia, are not "there" yet. I address the issue of palliative care in a recent post below, initially written in November 2021. I am not a certified eating disorder specialist. I am an Expert by Experience and college-educated with a BA in Community Work with an additional certificate in a one-year program in Business Administration from the same institution.
I am passionate about all of this because, as Shakespeare wrote in The Taming of the Shrew, Act 4, Scene 3: "My tongue will tell the anger [and sadness] of my heart or else my heart, concealing it, will break. And, rather than it shall, I will be free even to the uttermost, as I please in words."[2016]
Travel Guide
If you're new to my blog, I recommend you begin on the right side and take a look at the "Of Note" offerings. Read Dr. Cynthia Bulik's recent published interview (5/4/22) "Rethinking Eating Disorders" if you want to print an easy-to-understand professional's expert opinion about anorexia for your family doctor or the therapist. [Early intervention is absolutely critical. For those whose eating disorder is categorized as entrenched or severe and enduring, read the editorial comment by Stephen Touyz and Philipa Hay for a new approach about treatment. It is possible for your loved one to recover! I have also attached a link here for additional papers on the subject of severe and entrenched eating disorders. If you are a family member or friend of an adult with an eating disorder and have been at this for awhile, I refer you to the posts within the title "Adult Eating Disorders and Recovery Tools" found in the Index on the right hand side of this site. As well, in the "Of Note" section take a look at those posts with an asterisk. If you're a parent and need support, look for posts in the Index about parent support or parent toolbox.
In my opinion, the best book to buy, to refer to constantly and to share with members of the medical/psychiatric profession is "Sick Enough: A Guide to the Medical Complications of Eating Disorders" by Jennifer L. Gaudiani MD, CEDS, FAED. "Dr. Gaudiani aims to improve medical diagnosis and treatment, motivate recovery, and validate the lived experiences of individuals of all body shapes and sizes, while firmly rejecting dieting culture."
I recommend two groups who will support you on your journey - F.E.A.S.T and the National Alliance for Eating Disorders. Both maintain websites and Facebook private groups.
Showing posts with label eating disorder inpatient treatment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label eating disorder inpatient treatment. Show all posts
Sunday, May 1, 2016
Sunday, February 24, 2013
Updates and Thoughts re Eating Disorders that have become entrenched
Recently, I've posted three comments in other places that I've decided to draw together here. This post will be somewhat disjointed as a result and I will probably return to edit it. In the meantime, this also serves as an update of sorts and as another thank you to a woman -- Laura Collins -- who has made an enormous difference in the world of treatment for those with eating disorders. It occurs to me, as with other social movements,
that change comes from the bottom up. People like Laura Collins of
F.E.A.S.T. and others connected with the organization she has founded
(many, many parents and people currently on the -- at times -- tenuous road
to recovery) are gaining a strong toe-hold and getting the attention of
those who need to listen, many of them psychiatrists and therapists and treatment facilities who/which
aren't keeping up with developments in the understanding of the brain and behavior and the influence of environment, and should be.
The recent news out of Great Britain of a teenager who recently died because she was released from a eating disorder treatment facility by people who decided that because she was an "adult" she could move on to take care of herself motivated me to return to post here. Those people forgot that first, her brain was poorly nourished and therefore not functioning well, and that two, her prefrontal cortext -- the seat of where decision making is made -- was not (as with most teens is not) fully matured and probably would not be until her mid-twenties or because she had starved her brain, later than that.
An update of sorts is in order, because I have not posted here for quite some time.
First, for those with adult children with an ED that has become entrenched and who has a co-morbidity for example a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel may I suggest that you
(1) never give up hope;
(2) believe that their true self is still in there, buried under the eating disorder's take over of their mind and it is, believe me, a take over;
(3) search for any means possible to force/persuade the person into treatment at a facility where your loved one will be safe for at least six months (twelve months would be better) - not only from herself or himself but also from all the many outside influences that may take him/her off track;
[At this point of my list, I do suggest that you read Wasted by Marya Hornbacher. She was in such a treatment facility. Continuing to help someone with a long-term eating disorder is absolutely critical. You are dealing with, I am sure you know, a deadly illness.
(4) with an attorney if necessary, work with the medical/psychiatric staff at the facility to implement Sarah Ravin's excellent step program and be sure to follow the treatment. The first order of business is nutrition, nutrition, nutrition to bring your adult child's brain back to functioning order. Here is a link to what I am talking about:
http://www.blog.drsarahravin.com/eating-disorders/active-ingredients/
and then read this, too, also by Dr. Sarah Ravin:
http://www.blog.drsarahravin.com/eating-disorders/navigating-phase-ii/
This schedule is geared for someone whose ED is not as entrenched but it still highlights the time that is needed to overcome the ingrained behaviors.
(5) Even if nothing else but restoration of weight and stabilization of electrolytes and of your adult child's brain occurs in that twelve months or so, your loved one will have been given an opportunity to heal in ways that seem invisible but that are critical for recovery. A nourished and somewhat stable brain is the first step.
(6) If at all possible eliminate all diet soda esp that with aspartame as recent research has indicated diet soda seems to exacerbate depression.
(7) If at all possible eliminate or cut way back on anything with caffeine so that the person's sleep patterns and sleep itself are not interrupted.
(8) Again, looking at Sarah Ravin's schedule, know and understand that recovery is fragile and tenuous every step of the way for those first six months or so. Remember that a set-back is not the end of the world.
(9) A step-down facility may be (probably will be) necessary following this treatment in a locked facility.
(10) If you can, put together a team of people who "get" eating disorders and who "get" the person they are working with. An ideal team includes:
team leader who is herself/himself an experienced therapist
case manager
therapist for the co-morbidity
therapist for trauma work (if relevant)
nutritionist/registered dietician with ED education
occupational therapist
medical doctor
psychiatrist also trained in ED
http://desertdwellergettingon.blogspot.com/2010/11/team-approach-how-to-keep-recovery.html
An important component of this plan, as noted in the above link, is they all must have clearances to speak with each other and with the person (parent, spouse, etc.) who knows your son or daughter.
(11) if Borderline Personality Disorder was diagnosed (or emotional dysregulation disorder), get the very best therapist you can skilled in dialectical behavioral therapy who is at once kind but also hard as nails and who doesn't hesitate to seek their own therapist to help them because BPD is very difficult but not impossible to treat.
(12) remember that recovery is a long process rather than a one or two month treatment program. Most therapists recognize that recovery can and probably will take 5-7 years.
Progress...... one very small step at a time.
Always remember the saying, progress not perfection.
Also remember, eating disorders are brain disorders - an illness of the brain. If your loved one had tuberculosis (and the entire world is mobilizing for this disease probably because people suddenly realize it's becoming a real threat again, but just the same it is an illness) or cancer or MS or Parkinson's, real medical insurance companies would cover the treatment. There must be parity when it comes to eating disorders. Contact your national and state legislators. Demand parity. NAMI and NEDA are very active in this work. Our loved ones must be given a chance to heal just as someone with any physical disease must be given a chance. If treatment takes a long time or if it is chronic, then it must be covered and paid for. It must be.
To close, I woke up this morning and remembered something one of my family member's therapists told me a few years ago having to do with ED treatment:
There was a time, in California, when there was a program connected with a major university, the organizers of which believed a year of treatment was necessary for someone to overcome an eating disorder (as a first step). The program was funded by a government grant, as I recall.
So little. So soon. Too soon for the rest of the psychiatric world to learn about and identify with before the program was discontinued, unfortunately.
It's time to turn all of that around and return to the concept of long-term treatment, either in the home with paid leave covered by insurance to do this using formats such as that developed by therapist Dr. Sarah Ravin or in a formal treatment center that remains humanely connected with the family and that uses a very long term step-down program geared to the healing of the patient and not to some prescribed "everyone does it this way" kind of treatment.
I really do not know - I am not prescient - what the outcome will be for my family member but I do believe that it's important to share here what is being attempted on this person's behalf because little attention is being paid to those adults with entrenched ED's who could not benefit back then from what is known and is beginning to be practiced now.
The recent news out of Great Britain of a teenager who recently died because she was released from a eating disorder treatment facility by people who decided that because she was an "adult" she could move on to take care of herself motivated me to return to post here. Those people forgot that first, her brain was poorly nourished and therefore not functioning well, and that two, her prefrontal cortext -- the seat of where decision making is made -- was not (as with most teens is not) fully matured and probably would not be until her mid-twenties or because she had starved her brain, later than that.
An update of sorts is in order, because I have not posted here for quite some time.
First, for those with adult children with an ED that has become entrenched and who has a co-morbidity for example a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder and there seems to be no light at the end of the tunnel may I suggest that you
(1) never give up hope;
(2) believe that their true self is still in there, buried under the eating disorder's take over of their mind and it is, believe me, a take over;
(3) search for any means possible to force/persuade the person into treatment at a facility where your loved one will be safe for at least six months (twelve months would be better) - not only from herself or himself but also from all the many outside influences that may take him/her off track;
[At this point of my list, I do suggest that you read Wasted by Marya Hornbacher. She was in such a treatment facility. Continuing to help someone with a long-term eating disorder is absolutely critical. You are dealing with, I am sure you know, a deadly illness.
(4) with an attorney if necessary, work with the medical/psychiatric staff at the facility to implement Sarah Ravin's excellent step program and be sure to follow the treatment. The first order of business is nutrition, nutrition, nutrition to bring your adult child's brain back to functioning order. Here is a link to what I am talking about:
http://www.blog.drsarahravin.com/eating-disorders/active-ingredients/
and then read this, too, also by Dr. Sarah Ravin:
http://www.blog.drsarahravin.com/eating-disorders/navigating-phase-ii/
This schedule is geared for someone whose ED is not as entrenched but it still highlights the time that is needed to overcome the ingrained behaviors.
(5) Even if nothing else but restoration of weight and stabilization of electrolytes and of your adult child's brain occurs in that twelve months or so, your loved one will have been given an opportunity to heal in ways that seem invisible but that are critical for recovery. A nourished and somewhat stable brain is the first step.
(6) If at all possible eliminate all diet soda esp that with aspartame as recent research has indicated diet soda seems to exacerbate depression.
(7) If at all possible eliminate or cut way back on anything with caffeine so that the person's sleep patterns and sleep itself are not interrupted.
(8) Again, looking at Sarah Ravin's schedule, know and understand that recovery is fragile and tenuous every step of the way for those first six months or so. Remember that a set-back is not the end of the world.
(9) A step-down facility may be (probably will be) necessary following this treatment in a locked facility.
(10) If you can, put together a team of people who "get" eating disorders and who "get" the person they are working with. An ideal team includes:
team leader who is herself/himself an experienced therapist
case manager
therapist for the co-morbidity
therapist for trauma work (if relevant)
nutritionist/registered dietician with ED education
occupational therapist
medical doctor
psychiatrist also trained in ED
http://desertdwellergettingon.blogspot.com/2010/11/team-approach-how-to-keep-recovery.html
An important component of this plan, as noted in the above link, is they all must have clearances to speak with each other and with the person (parent, spouse, etc.) who knows your son or daughter.
(11) if Borderline Personality Disorder was diagnosed (or emotional dysregulation disorder), get the very best therapist you can skilled in dialectical behavioral therapy who is at once kind but also hard as nails and who doesn't hesitate to seek their own therapist to help them because BPD is very difficult but not impossible to treat.
(12) remember that recovery is a long process rather than a one or two month treatment program. Most therapists recognize that recovery can and probably will take 5-7 years.
Progress...... one very small step at a time.
Always remember the saying, progress not perfection.
Also remember, eating disorders are brain disorders - an illness of the brain. If your loved one had tuberculosis (and the entire world is mobilizing for this disease probably because people suddenly realize it's becoming a real threat again, but just the same it is an illness) or cancer or MS or Parkinson's, real medical insurance companies would cover the treatment. There must be parity when it comes to eating disorders. Contact your national and state legislators. Demand parity. NAMI and NEDA are very active in this work. Our loved ones must be given a chance to heal just as someone with any physical disease must be given a chance. If treatment takes a long time or if it is chronic, then it must be covered and paid for. It must be.
To close, I woke up this morning and remembered something one of my family member's therapists told me a few years ago having to do with ED treatment:
There was a time, in California, when there was a program connected with a major university, the organizers of which believed a year of treatment was necessary for someone to overcome an eating disorder (as a first step). The program was funded by a government grant, as I recall.
So little. So soon. Too soon for the rest of the psychiatric world to learn about and identify with before the program was discontinued, unfortunately.
It's time to turn all of that around and return to the concept of long-term treatment, either in the home with paid leave covered by insurance to do this using formats such as that developed by therapist Dr. Sarah Ravin or in a formal treatment center that remains humanely connected with the family and that uses a very long term step-down program geared to the healing of the patient and not to some prescribed "everyone does it this way" kind of treatment.
I really do not know - I am not prescient - what the outcome will be for my family member but I do believe that it's important to share here what is being attempted on this person's behalf because little attention is being paid to those adults with entrenched ED's who could not benefit back then from what is known and is beginning to be practiced now.
Sunday, January 6, 2013
Important step: Asking for Help
[revised - thought of some points while hiking later today]
Earlier this week I received an email from Real Age titled "4 Tips to Break Bad Habits." One of the tips is "enlist support -- ask for help."
I've learned over the years while listening at conferences and support groups, and reading literature that the concept of asking for help can be quite difficult for those with an eating disorder, particularly those with a perfectionistic bent and whose cultural norm is self-sufficiency, a norm heavily promoted by our society in my experience. Think of all those self-help books one finds on bookshelves.
Our sons and daughters who enter treatment at a residential or out-patient facility or even independent treatment with (hopefully) a skilled eating disorder therapist, are often given what are called tools to combat their brain disorder. The goal of those tools is to help them choose an alternative course of action rather than to turn to the behaviors that are endangering their lives or slowly killing them.
What is missing from the tool box, it seems to me, is the creation of a list of human resources -- people -- who will help the person in the moment thwart the desire to binge/purge or refrain from eating.
Many find they have a very hard time picking up that thousand pound telephone, even a cellphone can weigh that much when confronted with the need to call someone for help. Yet these contacts are critical - a buddy system, if you will. The buddy system is used in the Army when recruits are going through Basic Training.
Although much research continues on eating disorders, many have pointed to clues that the behaviors involved in eating disorders become actual habits that are rewarded by the release of dopamine and other substances that either bring pleasure or relief or reduction of anxiety/fear (among other things).
The goal is to change that habit.
Before release from treatment in a residential facility or before leaving the day program for home or while working with a therapist in a 50-minute session, the person with an ED would be well-served with the creation by him/her working with the therapist of a people resources list that might even be laminated and carried with him/her at all times or entered into a cellphone database.
Many treatment facilities will forbid a visit to the rest room for an hour after meals. That's great but who will become the monitor after the fact? Instead, provide practice sessions where the person graduates to no monitoring but is encouraged to go find help if the urge sneaks up on them to purge. In real life situations out on pass, for example, encourage the person to ask for help before the urge to grab a handful of aspartame packets at the coffee shop or give a sandwich to a friend during school rather than eat it for lunch takes over. I'm sure there could be lots of other examples and I mention only a few to avoid triggers for those reading this.
There are Facebook pages and individual blogs out there used by people in recovery who reach out when they find themselves struggling -- another great way to ask for help.
Asking for help is part of the new behavior that must be developed for the person to survive. Some might be able to turn to their own inner resources immediately (possibly because they're sick of being sick and tired), but most will need this extra step to make it all fit together, I think. Perhaps the lack of this is one contributor to the relapse rate?
Encourage the creation of a multiple buddy system of people who will support the endeavor to get well rather than enable the person to continue with their behavior!
Just maybe we cannot do "it" alone.
[I write this piece with thanks to a therapeutic clinical treatment team that has developed this approach. I think the approach makes a world of sense.]
Earlier this week I received an email from Real Age titled "4 Tips to Break Bad Habits." One of the tips is "enlist support -- ask for help."
I've learned over the years while listening at conferences and support groups, and reading literature that the concept of asking for help can be quite difficult for those with an eating disorder, particularly those with a perfectionistic bent and whose cultural norm is self-sufficiency, a norm heavily promoted by our society in my experience. Think of all those self-help books one finds on bookshelves.
Our sons and daughters who enter treatment at a residential or out-patient facility or even independent treatment with (hopefully) a skilled eating disorder therapist, are often given what are called tools to combat their brain disorder. The goal of those tools is to help them choose an alternative course of action rather than to turn to the behaviors that are endangering their lives or slowly killing them.
What is missing from the tool box, it seems to me, is the creation of a list of human resources -- people -- who will help the person in the moment thwart the desire to binge/purge or refrain from eating.
Many find they have a very hard time picking up that thousand pound telephone, even a cellphone can weigh that much when confronted with the need to call someone for help. Yet these contacts are critical - a buddy system, if you will. The buddy system is used in the Army when recruits are going through Basic Training.
Although much research continues on eating disorders, many have pointed to clues that the behaviors involved in eating disorders become actual habits that are rewarded by the release of dopamine and other substances that either bring pleasure or relief or reduction of anxiety/fear (among other things).
The goal is to change that habit.
Before release from treatment in a residential facility or before leaving the day program for home or while working with a therapist in a 50-minute session, the person with an ED would be well-served with the creation by him/her working with the therapist of a people resources list that might even be laminated and carried with him/her at all times or entered into a cellphone database.
Many treatment facilities will forbid a visit to the rest room for an hour after meals. That's great but who will become the monitor after the fact? Instead, provide practice sessions where the person graduates to no monitoring but is encouraged to go find help if the urge sneaks up on them to purge. In real life situations out on pass, for example, encourage the person to ask for help before the urge to grab a handful of aspartame packets at the coffee shop or give a sandwich to a friend during school rather than eat it for lunch takes over. I'm sure there could be lots of other examples and I mention only a few to avoid triggers for those reading this.
There are Facebook pages and individual blogs out there used by people in recovery who reach out when they find themselves struggling -- another great way to ask for help.
Asking for help is part of the new behavior that must be developed for the person to survive. Some might be able to turn to their own inner resources immediately (possibly because they're sick of being sick and tired), but most will need this extra step to make it all fit together, I think. Perhaps the lack of this is one contributor to the relapse rate?
Encourage the creation of a multiple buddy system of people who will support the endeavor to get well rather than enable the person to continue with their behavior!
Just maybe we cannot do "it" alone.
[I write this piece with thanks to a therapeutic clinical treatment team that has developed this approach. I think the approach makes a world of sense.]
Wednesday, October 17, 2012
The dilemma of long term illness
I've put down my "pen" for awhile. I took a long break for myself secure in the knowledge that a team of very dedicated people was figuring out how to move forward on literally a day-to-day basis and that I not only needed to emotionally disengage but also needed to trust the process.
Earlier this year I did pull together a few articles and news items about entrenched eating disorders. Eating Disorders can be long term battles.
After this hiatus that included a wonderful change of scenery, I returned to reading (I had thought I would just lurk) posts in a variety of places and came across a discussion about "walking away."
I believe "walking away" is different from "emotionally disengaging" - at least the semantics to me indicate a difference. And, I have chosen never to do this in the more than 24 years that ED has been present in the life of my loved one.
Here's a piece (somewhat modified) that I recently wrote to address why I will not walk away. The quote at the beginning of my post below is thoughtful and important. However, there's more to the picture and here's my take.
I fully agree with this statement.
However, in some cases the likelihood of death occurring before this status is reached can be very high. I know this. I have witnessed this. Scarily close.
If insurance companies are starting to redflag people who "fail" treatment [apparently this is happening], I would ask whose failure is it really? It's not just that of the person whose brain is altered by starvation and purging or binging.
I firmly support the idea that re-nourishment and re-establishment of positive behaviors takes more than 3 months and I become furious when I hear that an insurance company has stopped payment for treatment of this insidious set of diseases. I would advocate for a year! and early on there was a program, I believe in California, that did offer a year. But this was many years ago and funding dried up. As I've written here before, not all families have the wherewithall to put Maudsley into practice in their home. In addition, sometimes family based therapy in combination with re-feeding at home just doesn't work.
It's a very rare insurance company that provides treatment for longer than three months. And the thing is, more time is absolutely necessary to break the bonds that ED has formed with the brain of the person with the disease/brain circuit disorder.
The second problem that can develop is, for example, as a person with Borderline Personality Disorder as a co-diagnosis (and even this is a hurdle because many doctors, therapists and therefore insurance companies do not yet accept/recognize BPD as a brain circuit disorder; rather they identify BPD as a personality disorder) who starts to get a handle on what is going on, it's as though a red cape is unfurled in front of some of them instigating behaviors that completely disrupt their ability to continue in an environment labeled "willing to be here." Private facilities require that an adult client be "willing to be here."
I have witnessed this so many times. I can personally recount the experience of my loved one making the firm decision to get well and taking the responsibility of getting into a facility her responsibility. For one month I drove her at her request to obtain physicals and labs and doctor's visits and therapy, etc., etc., etc. to obtain all the documentation she needed to be admitted to a facility. She did the work; I provided the transportation. All was set. She was accepted. She struggled in the beginning to eat as do most who have an ED. She gained weight. She gained strength and then bingo! her BPD/ED combo took charge and she was asked to leave even though the part of her who knew she needed to stay begged to stay while the other part totally interfered. I know this happened. Nadia Shivak in her book Inside Out: A Portrait of an Eating Disorder illustrated this very simply in words and drawn pictures. [The reference is in my list of books on my blog.]
I wish private residential facilities would change their policy of not continuing to work with a client who isn't willing. I believe this hurdle must change even if it's against the person's will because that will is still dominated by disordered and distorted thinking (refer here to the Keyes Starvation Study) for several months.
I don't think this hurdle is only for those with BPD, either. An addiction is a terrible brain chemical change that undermines a person, whatever that addiction is. It takes a change of heart and mind to be willing to get on the road to recovery and to avoid whatever it is that's addictive.
How? I think this is the question of the hour. When it comes to food -- which is life, along with water here in the desert -- this particular addiction (which I believe an eating disorder becomes) is deadly in a different sense. Alcohol isn't a source of life; neither is, for example, heroin or crack or percocet. There is a difference.
Researchers and doctors and insurance companies and parents and loved ones must come to recognize this fact.
One extraordinary team has come to this conclusion and is doing all it can to create an environment to bring about this change of mind in the sense of ingrained behavioral patterns. The will to live has never left the person I am talking about but the disease and the addiction it created interfered big time and the claws of that disease and addiction go very deep. I believe this change can happen.
May I respectfully say that "walking away" isn't the way I would word what must be done for people with eating disorders whose disease is entrenched. Having stood by as an ally for 24 years, I firmly believe this. As a survivor of anorexia/bulimia, I firmly believe this. I didn't have the additional brain circuit disorder component nor, thank God, was I cursed with an addictive brain so strong as to turn to other behaviors that further interfered with my choosing (yes, finally choosing) to get well. Others aren't that lucky.
Earlier this year I did pull together a few articles and news items about entrenched eating disorders. Eating Disorders can be long term battles.
After this hiatus that included a wonderful change of scenery, I returned to reading (I had thought I would just lurk) posts in a variety of places and came across a discussion about "walking away."
I believe "walking away" is different from "emotionally disengaging" - at least the semantics to me indicate a difference. And, I have chosen never to do this in the more than 24 years that ED has been present in the life of my loved one.
Here's a piece (somewhat modified) that I recently wrote to address why I will not walk away. The quote at the beginning of my post below is thoughtful and important. However, there's more to the picture and here's my take.
| Quote: |
| As it has been said many times, sometimes it's only when those individuals finally get tired of what their lives have become that change occurs. |
I fully agree with this statement.
However, in some cases the likelihood of death occurring before this status is reached can be very high. I know this. I have witnessed this. Scarily close.
If insurance companies are starting to redflag people who "fail" treatment [apparently this is happening], I would ask whose failure is it really? It's not just that of the person whose brain is altered by starvation and purging or binging.
I firmly support the idea that re-nourishment and re-establishment of positive behaviors takes more than 3 months and I become furious when I hear that an insurance company has stopped payment for treatment of this insidious set of diseases. I would advocate for a year! and early on there was a program, I believe in California, that did offer a year. But this was many years ago and funding dried up. As I've written here before, not all families have the wherewithall to put Maudsley into practice in their home. In addition, sometimes family based therapy in combination with re-feeding at home just doesn't work.
It's a very rare insurance company that provides treatment for longer than three months. And the thing is, more time is absolutely necessary to break the bonds that ED has formed with the brain of the person with the disease/brain circuit disorder.
The second problem that can develop is, for example, as a person with Borderline Personality Disorder as a co-diagnosis (and even this is a hurdle because many doctors, therapists and therefore insurance companies do not yet accept/recognize BPD as a brain circuit disorder; rather they identify BPD as a personality disorder) who starts to get a handle on what is going on, it's as though a red cape is unfurled in front of some of them instigating behaviors that completely disrupt their ability to continue in an environment labeled "willing to be here." Private facilities require that an adult client be "willing to be here."
I have witnessed this so many times. I can personally recount the experience of my loved one making the firm decision to get well and taking the responsibility of getting into a facility her responsibility. For one month I drove her at her request to obtain physicals and labs and doctor's visits and therapy, etc., etc., etc. to obtain all the documentation she needed to be admitted to a facility. She did the work; I provided the transportation. All was set. She was accepted. She struggled in the beginning to eat as do most who have an ED. She gained weight. She gained strength and then bingo! her BPD/ED combo took charge and she was asked to leave even though the part of her who knew she needed to stay begged to stay while the other part totally interfered. I know this happened. Nadia Shivak in her book Inside Out: A Portrait of an Eating Disorder illustrated this very simply in words and drawn pictures. [The reference is in my list of books on my blog.]
I wish private residential facilities would change their policy of not continuing to work with a client who isn't willing. I believe this hurdle must change even if it's against the person's will because that will is still dominated by disordered and distorted thinking (refer here to the Keyes Starvation Study) for several months.
I don't think this hurdle is only for those with BPD, either. An addiction is a terrible brain chemical change that undermines a person, whatever that addiction is. It takes a change of heart and mind to be willing to get on the road to recovery and to avoid whatever it is that's addictive.
How? I think this is the question of the hour. When it comes to food -- which is life, along with water here in the desert -- this particular addiction (which I believe an eating disorder becomes) is deadly in a different sense. Alcohol isn't a source of life; neither is, for example, heroin or crack or percocet. There is a difference.
Researchers and doctors and insurance companies and parents and loved ones must come to recognize this fact.
One extraordinary team has come to this conclusion and is doing all it can to create an environment to bring about this change of mind in the sense of ingrained behavioral patterns. The will to live has never left the person I am talking about but the disease and the addiction it created interfered big time and the claws of that disease and addiction go very deep. I believe this change can happen.
May I respectfully say that "walking away" isn't the way I would word what must be done for people with eating disorders whose disease is entrenched. Having stood by as an ally for 24 years, I firmly believe this. As a survivor of anorexia/bulimia, I firmly believe this. I didn't have the additional brain circuit disorder component nor, thank God, was I cursed with an addictive brain so strong as to turn to other behaviors that further interfered with my choosing (yes, finally choosing) to get well. Others aren't that lucky.
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Against Their Will - A P.S. with thanks to an article by Jeneen Interlandi in the New York Times Magazine, June 24, 2012
Today's New York Times Magazine (Sunday, June 24, 2012, pp. 25-29, 38, 46-7) carries an article written by Jeneen Interlandi about the journey their family took through emergency rooms, psychiatric wards, psychiatric courtrooms, and in their case jails.
The title of the article, linked here, A Madman in Our Midst, grabs the attention of the ordinary reader in a way that another title might not. I know I cringed at the title because it exacerbates stigma but I applaud Jeneen and her family for making this story public and for incorporating so much information about the history and the status of the mental health care system in our country, in some cases state by state, as well as the arguments pro and con about involuntary commitment and treatment.
I think Jeneen Interlandi's article highlights and vastly expands upon what I wrote in a previous post, "Against Their Will - Treatment for ED and Other Brain Disorders." The details she provides about the struggles her family had with the ethics of all of this reflect back to Dr. Tomas Silber's article, "Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa Against the Patient's Will: Ethical Considerations."
As Ms. Interlandi writes and as many of us caught in this cycle will tell you, "the absurdity of this situation wore on us. How was anyone with a diagnosed mental illness supposed to recover through a revolving door of emergency rooms, short-term psych wards and [in her father's case] jail?"
If you are interested in what's happening across the country, take a look at the website of the Treatment Advocacy Center, the purpose of which is to "eliminate barriers to the treatment of mental illness" and which is lobbying for broader involuntary commitment standards. Just released by the Center is A Guide for Implementing Assisted Outpatient Treatment, that [from the website] "includes 64 pages of practical information and instruction and appendices containing more than 30 sample forms and other documentation. For links to the guide, its appendices and samples, click here.
Change is needed for those who need to gain assured (meaning at least 6 months), not short-term, stability, in a safe place before consideration of next steps. As an advocate for those with entrenched eating disorders, I believe this placement with guided nutrition and therapy followed by a step-down program, must be available and is especially necessary.
The title of the article, linked here, A Madman in Our Midst, grabs the attention of the ordinary reader in a way that another title might not. I know I cringed at the title because it exacerbates stigma but I applaud Jeneen and her family for making this story public and for incorporating so much information about the history and the status of the mental health care system in our country, in some cases state by state, as well as the arguments pro and con about involuntary commitment and treatment.
I think Jeneen Interlandi's article highlights and vastly expands upon what I wrote in a previous post, "Against Their Will - Treatment for ED and Other Brain Disorders." The details she provides about the struggles her family had with the ethics of all of this reflect back to Dr. Tomas Silber's article, "Treatment of Anorexia Nervosa Against the Patient's Will: Ethical Considerations."
As Ms. Interlandi writes and as many of us caught in this cycle will tell you, "the absurdity of this situation wore on us. How was anyone with a diagnosed mental illness supposed to recover through a revolving door of emergency rooms, short-term psych wards and [in her father's case] jail?"
If you are interested in what's happening across the country, take a look at the website of the Treatment Advocacy Center, the purpose of which is to "eliminate barriers to the treatment of mental illness" and which is lobbying for broader involuntary commitment standards. Just released by the Center is A Guide for Implementing Assisted Outpatient Treatment, that [from the website] "includes 64 pages of practical information and instruction and appendices containing more than 30 sample forms and other documentation. For links to the guide, its appendices and samples, click here.
Change is needed for those who need to gain assured (meaning at least 6 months), not short-term, stability, in a safe place before consideration of next steps. As an advocate for those with entrenched eating disorders, I believe this placement with guided nutrition and therapy followed by a step-down program, must be available and is especially necessary.
Friday, June 22, 2012
Against Their Will - Treatment for ED and other Brain Disorders
Yesterday, while exploring the links that accompanied Laura Collins' recently posted presentation at the International Conference on Eating Disorders (ICED) in May 2012, I noticed a link to an article by Tomas J. Silber, MD, MAAS titled Treatment of Anorexia against the Patient's Will: Ethical Considerations.
Silber's topic and the outcome of this kind of decision, referred to here in Arizona as Title 36, has continued to be a thorn for me because I and my loved one's team have made the decision to utilize this law several times as a last ditch effort to save her life. It's a wrenchingly difficult decision to make for reasons that Silber discusses. In all cases but one (and a month later she and we suffered the consequences of the judge thinking she was competent and could make it and at that point Title 36 was invoked) approval was granted, the most recent being almost six months ago. Only over the past two months has she begun to re-gain (the word is used to illustrate that once upon a time she was at a healthy weight and needs to return to it) the weight through balanced nutrition so that she (her brain/body) is able to do the work ahead. This initial process - to reach stability - can take six months to a year! She's never been able to do this for a variety of reasons. The most recent step is an attempt to give her another opportunity.
Yesterday, a well-educated scientist who is knowledgeable (because she is also in recovery) about eating disorders, took a thoughtful look at the recent situation in Wales in which a judge, at the urging of the care team, has ordered forced feeding for a woman who had given up the fight and whose immediate family agreed with her decision. The consequent at times thoughtful at times emotion filled discussion has raised, I think with great value, the topic of eating disorders, specifically starvation eating disorders to public consciousness at a much higher level than before. [The post referred to is no longer available on line.]
We need to keep this conversation going.
The bottom line, for me, that so many of us continue to state is that nutrition must come first, for without a return to nutrition, the brain and the body don't have a chance against a starvation eating disorder. And that return requires stability for quite some time afterwards, too. And, this is only the beginning. The hardest part is ahead for this young woman and for others who need to overcome entrenched feelings and behavioral patterns.
So, back to Dr. Silber's article which takes a look at the ethics of treatment against a patient's will. He includes in his introduction the point, which is well-known in the eating disorder community whether treatment occurs at home or in a hospital or in a residential setting, "....In many, if not most, instances of treatment for AN, patients receive some form of treatment against their will."(p. 283) One only needs to read Harriet Brown's important book Brave Girl Eating to learn that even at home getting a child in the clutches of a starvation eating disorder to eat isn't the simple matter of just placing a plate in front of her/him and pleasantly asking him or her to eat. Rather, it's a matter of loving yet firm persuasion met with screams, and thrown and/or spit out food, and so forth until the child is re-nourished enough to start to participate in the process.
Silber goes on to say, "....The situation can become even more difficult to address once patients reach the age of majority." (p. 283)
This is the situation for the woman in Wales. This is the situation for those entrenched in eating disorders. This is the situation for my family member.
As he notes, the patient's entire team (if s/he is lucky enough to have one) may not reach agreement on how to proceed and often the decision must be taken on by another family member or a doctor or ultimately a judge.
To approach a decision, Silber proposes what he calls Justified Paternalism (JP) (p. 284 of the article published in Adoles Med State Art Rev. 2011;22(2):283-8,x.) and he believes that JP must be wise, meaning that one must realize one violates a moral rule and second that there must be a compelling reason.
He refers to two papers the conclusions of which are similar to Title 36 with the addition of "c)the person is likely to be thankful for the treatment at a later time,.... and "d)the intrusion is generalizable, in the sense that those supporting it would wish the same on themselves."
[I actually wonder if the judge read Silber's paper because it's so compelling in its pro and con positions, particularly in regards to eating disorders.]
He next discusses autonomy and society's drift towards leaving decisions to the patient. He recognizes during this discussion that someone with an eating disorder is quite able to present pseudo competence, therefore meeting standards for competency as also outlined in Title 36.
Yet, as many of us in the trenches and as Silber then goes on to recognize, those with a starvation eating disorder aren't fully competent; their brains and their bodies have been compromised and will remain so until they are renourished and stabilized in that renourished state. He also recognizes the supreme importance of involvement of the patient's family and/or social network -- the team that Dr. Janet Treasure and others advocate.
Silber presents research that underscores his arguments and also highlights the difficulty of working with teenagers and more particularly adults, and closes his paper with an emphasis on values and the importance of how the person perceives herself/himself to be respected during the treatment process. In other words, as he writes, "....At the end it is always values that underlie and strengthen the good work. These include fundamental respect for the person, even as liberty is restricted; beneficence; and truth telling." (p. 286)
I have heard parents say that they and their family member(s) are regarded as "less than" in these kinds of settings and a balance must be found so that all concerned believe they are participating in the effort to help their family member recover. Silber speaks to this important need.
Silber concludes, and I hope that the prolonged treatment the judge has ordered for the young woman in Wales and for others remanded to treatment evolves into, "....Treatment interventions for eating disorders need to include not only the biopsychoscocial and spiritual components that have enriched the field over the years, but also need to incorporate a philosophical dimension that takes into account a reflective understanding of patient autonomy; patients' rights; obligation to protect; respect for persons; right to treatment refusal; and, last but not least, justified paternalism and an expanded concept of autonomy." (p.287)
In closing, I want to thank the author known as Extra Long Tail and Laura Collins for their recent posts. The information provided I am sure, with dissemination, will improve the care of others who have starvation eating disorders, a term that I came across last night in a book by Doreen A. Samelson, ED.D., MSCP titled Feeding the Starving Mind (New Harbinger Publications, Inc., 2009).
Silber's topic and the outcome of this kind of decision, referred to here in Arizona as Title 36, has continued to be a thorn for me because I and my loved one's team have made the decision to utilize this law several times as a last ditch effort to save her life. It's a wrenchingly difficult decision to make for reasons that Silber discusses. In all cases but one (and a month later she and we suffered the consequences of the judge thinking she was competent and could make it and at that point Title 36 was invoked) approval was granted, the most recent being almost six months ago. Only over the past two months has she begun to re-gain (the word is used to illustrate that once upon a time she was at a healthy weight and needs to return to it) the weight through balanced nutrition so that she (her brain/body) is able to do the work ahead. This initial process - to reach stability - can take six months to a year! She's never been able to do this for a variety of reasons. The most recent step is an attempt to give her another opportunity.
Yesterday, a well-educated scientist who is knowledgeable (because she is also in recovery) about eating disorders, took a thoughtful look at the recent situation in Wales in which a judge, at the urging of the care team, has ordered forced feeding for a woman who had given up the fight and whose immediate family agreed with her decision. The consequent at times thoughtful at times emotion filled discussion has raised, I think with great value, the topic of eating disorders, specifically starvation eating disorders to public consciousness at a much higher level than before. [The post referred to is no longer available on line.]
We need to keep this conversation going.
The bottom line, for me, that so many of us continue to state is that nutrition must come first, for without a return to nutrition, the brain and the body don't have a chance against a starvation eating disorder. And that return requires stability for quite some time afterwards, too. And, this is only the beginning. The hardest part is ahead for this young woman and for others who need to overcome entrenched feelings and behavioral patterns.
So, back to Dr. Silber's article which takes a look at the ethics of treatment against a patient's will. He includes in his introduction the point, which is well-known in the eating disorder community whether treatment occurs at home or in a hospital or in a residential setting, "....In many, if not most, instances of treatment for AN, patients receive some form of treatment against their will."(p. 283) One only needs to read Harriet Brown's important book Brave Girl Eating to learn that even at home getting a child in the clutches of a starvation eating disorder to eat isn't the simple matter of just placing a plate in front of her/him and pleasantly asking him or her to eat. Rather, it's a matter of loving yet firm persuasion met with screams, and thrown and/or spit out food, and so forth until the child is re-nourished enough to start to participate in the process.
Silber goes on to say, "....The situation can become even more difficult to address once patients reach the age of majority." (p. 283)
This is the situation for the woman in Wales. This is the situation for those entrenched in eating disorders. This is the situation for my family member.
As he notes, the patient's entire team (if s/he is lucky enough to have one) may not reach agreement on how to proceed and often the decision must be taken on by another family member or a doctor or ultimately a judge.
To approach a decision, Silber proposes what he calls Justified Paternalism (JP) (p. 284 of the article published in Adoles Med State Art Rev. 2011;22(2):283-8,x.) and he believes that JP must be wise, meaning that one must realize one violates a moral rule and second that there must be a compelling reason.
He refers to two papers the conclusions of which are similar to Title 36 with the addition of "c)the person is likely to be thankful for the treatment at a later time,.... and "d)the intrusion is generalizable, in the sense that those supporting it would wish the same on themselves."
[I actually wonder if the judge read Silber's paper because it's so compelling in its pro and con positions, particularly in regards to eating disorders.]
He next discusses autonomy and society's drift towards leaving decisions to the patient. He recognizes during this discussion that someone with an eating disorder is quite able to present pseudo competence, therefore meeting standards for competency as also outlined in Title 36.
Yet, as many of us in the trenches and as Silber then goes on to recognize, those with a starvation eating disorder aren't fully competent; their brains and their bodies have been compromised and will remain so until they are renourished and stabilized in that renourished state. He also recognizes the supreme importance of involvement of the patient's family and/or social network -- the team that Dr. Janet Treasure and others advocate.
Silber presents research that underscores his arguments and also highlights the difficulty of working with teenagers and more particularly adults, and closes his paper with an emphasis on values and the importance of how the person perceives herself/himself to be respected during the treatment process. In other words, as he writes, "....At the end it is always values that underlie and strengthen the good work. These include fundamental respect for the person, even as liberty is restricted; beneficence; and truth telling." (p. 286)
I have heard parents say that they and their family member(s) are regarded as "less than" in these kinds of settings and a balance must be found so that all concerned believe they are participating in the effort to help their family member recover. Silber speaks to this important need.
Silber concludes, and I hope that the prolonged treatment the judge has ordered for the young woman in Wales and for others remanded to treatment evolves into, "....Treatment interventions for eating disorders need to include not only the biopsychoscocial and spiritual components that have enriched the field over the years, but also need to incorporate a philosophical dimension that takes into account a reflective understanding of patient autonomy; patients' rights; obligation to protect; respect for persons; right to treatment refusal; and, last but not least, justified paternalism and an expanded concept of autonomy." (p.287)
In closing, I want to thank the author known as Extra Long Tail and Laura Collins for their recent posts. The information provided I am sure, with dissemination, will improve the care of others who have starvation eating disorders, a term that I came across last night in a book by Doreen A. Samelson, ED.D., MSCP titled Feeding the Starving Mind (New Harbinger Publications, Inc., 2009).
Tuesday, December 6, 2011
Guest Post by Dr. Julie O'Toole - Inpatient Eating Disorder Treatment Checklist for Parents
If your child or adolescent is admitted to a hospital for the medical complications of an eating disorder, you need to carefully assess adequacy of care at that hospital.
Common sense would dictate that we not become aggressive, belittling or demanding of professionals on whom our child is temporarily dependent for medical intervention, however you should not hesitate to inform yourself, rely on your intuition and experience and ask questions. The days of “because I said so and I am the doctor” are gone in medicine, or should be.There are basically two types of medical hospitalizations for eating disorder crises: 1. the emergent kind at the nearest hospital, regardless of that hospital’s specific eating disorder expertise and 2. the urgent kind in a hospital which you have sought out specifically because of their expertise in treating the complications of eating disorders.
In the first kind of hospitalization, you may need to be patient until imminent danger of death has passed and then arrange transfer elsewhere. An example of this might be an admission to an internist, pediatrician or hospitalist at a community hospital for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, severe inanition (wasting) or syncope (fainting). We had an adolescent patient referred to us once whom the police had found semi-conscious at the side of the road, grossly starved and cold. This extreme is what I mean by an emergent admission for inanition. If such an admission is needed and the hospital team does not have an AED handbook for medical care, provide them with one.
The second kind of admission (urgent, experienced or specialist hospital) is more usually done for a patient who may or may not be expected to die without such care, but who is in any case compromised medically and/or may reasonably be feared to be in danger of re-feeding syndrome if re-fed in another setting. Such patients might be expected to meet AAP admission guidelines for orthostasis, bradycardia, etc.
The following is a check list I am proposing for parents to use in evaluating the adequacy of their child’s hospital care:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent? Are you blamed for your child’s illness? Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited? If the answer to any of these questions is “yes”, move this hospital to the “unacceptable” pile and seek care elsewhere as soon as you can.
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care? This needs to be an attending physician or nurse practitioner. If it is a team of doctors who rotate, ask who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs.
- How often is phosphorus checked? This will need to be daily (or more often in the Intensive Care Unit, aka ICU) as long as calories are still being adjusted upward.
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight? Most hospitalizations are not long enough to achieve full weight restoration and ultimate goal weights usually only matter this early in the hospitalization in those cases where a need for weight restoration is ignored, for example where the doctor/team argues that the “patient’s BMI was too high to begin with” (!!). For most patients the issue addressed under Point 5 below is much more critical. I strongly recommend that weight goals not be shared with the pediatric patient either by the staff or by the parent.
- Although it is common for a patient to actually lose weight for the first 2-4 days of re-feeding due to fluid shifts, after that the weight curve should be steadily upward. Ask: who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily? Excellent weight gain should average 0.2 kg/day. If it is lower than that see Point 6 below.
- Calculating calories/food intake: the majority of patients hospitalized for an eating disorder will have lost weight relative to their own norm. This means they will enter the re-feeding process hypometabolic as the brain tries to conserve energy in a time of famine. Once you begin re-feeding, however, the metabolic fires will jump up and the patient will need many more calories than ever before. It is critical that calories/food are titrated to weight gain, so that if the rate of gain is much less than 0.2 kg/day more food will be added. Fat must never be allowed to be restricted. On this specific point your questions for your treatment team are: What is the start point for caloric intake (low is fine)? How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often? And—importantly—is phosphorus checked during this time? I strongly recommend that discussions of calories/exchanges/fat grams not be shared with the pediatric patient by the staff or by a parent.
- How are meals supervised? I can’t tell you how often kids report back to me that they were able to hide food or spit out medications because of a lack of adequate staff supervision.
- Aftercare should be discussed from the outset, after about 24 hrs of hospital care. Everyone is usually too upset for the first 24 hours to take in much information about aftercare planning, but in order to maintain the gains made in the hospital and prevent re-hospitalization, it will be important to hand-off the pediatric patient to an outpatient team whether that team is a “Maudsley” style team, a day treatment team or other. How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers (including the family of course!)?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging? Experienced teams will always have a plan for this. It matters.
- Are patients with very low heart rates or personal histories of fainting monitored on telemetry? We have had a handful of patients who experienced “asystole” or stopping of the heart, which caused them to “faint”. Had they not been on telemetry we might have just ascribed this to “dehydration”. On the cardiac monitor we were clearly able to see how, in some vulnerable patients, the heart can be acted on by a simple stimulus such as a blood draw, standing up from lying down, etc. with an episode of cardiac arrest.
So to recap the questions:
- Does the hospital team resent your involvement as a parent?
- Are you blamed for your child’s illness?
- Is your hospital contact with your child severely limited?
- Who is principally in charge of your child’s medical care?
- Who will be responsible for communicating daily with you about such things as weight progress and labs?
- How often is phosphorus checked?
- What does the doctor/team consider a preliminary goal weight?
- Who will calculate weight gain and is it done daily?
- What is the start point for caloric intake?
- How will the calories be increased? By whom? How often?
- Are calories increased to meet any loss of weight or stagnation in weight gain?
- Is phosphorus checked during this time (of caloric increase)?
- How are meals supervised?
- How will the hospital team plan for follow-up care and communicate with those providers?
- What criteria do you use for discharge?
- How do you monitor access to the bathrooms in the hospital so that my child is safe from exercise or purging?
- Do they keep their patients with bradycardia (low heart rate) on telemetry?
[Re-printed here with the permission of Dr. O'Toole who is the founder and medical director of the Kartini Clinic for Disordered Eating.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)