I'll start with noting that this morning there is a very thoughtful
discussion on NPR on the Diane Rehm Show about psychiatric problems in young adults. This can be accessed on line and listened to. The conversation has ranged the gamut from symptoms, to the legal system, to insurance, to medications (and their cost as well as the availability of the original medication rather than a generic that may not work the same way), to treatment, to housing/care.
Often mentioned is the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) the
website of which is extremely helpful to families who must start navigating the confusing maze that often brings loved ones right back to the start, to need to begin all over again figuring out what to do for their family member. In fact, the NAMI website today provides a thoughtful statement on the situation here in Tucson.
The reason I feel this is relevant to a discussion about eating disorders is that eating disorders are brain disorders and in addition often there is an underlying psychiatric illness that precipitates a person to turn to coping mechanisms to deal with what they are thinking and feeling.
This is relevant because as those of us who have family members with eating disorders or other psychiatric disorders have discovered, it can be practically impossible still in many areas to get medical/psychiatric assistance for our loved ones, especially adults. Fortunately, increasingly health insurance companies are recognizing that early treatment and follow up can be significantly less costly to them than repeated hospitalizations that only place a band-aid on the symptoms - meaning stabilization of the ED patient including their electrolytes before release again.
Further, in response to those who ask why more was not done (very well covered in the discussion this morning on the Diane Rehm show), I've provided in earlier
posts some of the paths a loved one/parent can take to obtain treatment for their adult child but the bottom line truly is that your child, once an adult, has the legal right to refuse treatment, to be evaluated for treatment (unless s/he is petitioned legally and the petition is granted and acted upon), and even to take medications because many people with mental illnesses can experience what is called
anosognosia which is a severe lack of insight, the belief is fixed in spite of overwhelming evidence provided to them, and illogical attempts to explain away the evidence (from p. 33 of Dr. Xavier Amador's terrific book, in paperback, titled
I Am Not Sick I Don't Need Help (revised edition) published by Vida Press, New York). Further, an adult can refuse to permit any member of the treatment team to reveal what is going on unless the person signs releases for specifically named people to know what is going on.
Much of this applies to the current situation because health records are sealed from place to place and incident to incident unless a law has been broken and/or if underage the record can be cleared if a diversion program is entered and completed. I can personally attest to this lack of sharing records because only through careful record keeping, making copies of records released to me and then provided to new caregivers of others involved in additional situations, have I been able to serve as an advocate who provides critical information for ongoing care.
In other words,
do not assume that the current caregiver (including hospital staffs) are at all aware of previous hospitalizations even at that location and the reasons for them, medications taken, and recorded behavior of the individual. Do not assume this provision of information even if you have petitioned an individual, as you can here, under what is known in this State as Title 36. The past can be a blank slate unless this information is brought forward by means available including signed releases.
Further,
do not assume that your loved one will be placed in a residential facility or hospital through Title 36 procedures just because they are deemed to be ill. Often, if the person is reasonably competent (as many of our loved ones can be even though desperately ill), the person and his/her attorney can persuade the judge and medical personnel that they can deal on the outside and are released, often to the parents who may be in no way capable of providing the care needed.
Here the client is usually still assigned to a mental health provider that is required to follow the person's progress and provide services. However, with severe funding cut backs, it may take months to get appropriate care unless health insurance is available and even then getting in to see the appropriate person can be difficult.
Laws do vary from state to state. As I noted in the post linked especially about care for an adult and further about what can one do to set up a
team if treatment is denied or refused, other steps can be taken but I firmly believe laws need to be amended somehow to permit the release of records in case an advocate who has followed the person's life is not available.